Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Coal based electric generation comparative technologies report

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/6266153· OSTI ID:6266153
Ohio Clean Fuels, Inc., (OCF) has licensed technology that involves Co-Processing (Co-Pro) poor grade (high sulfur) coal and residual oil feedstocks to produce clean liquid fuels on a commercial scale. Stone Webster is requested to perform a comparative technologies report for grassroot plants utilizing coal as a base fuel. In the case of Co-Processing technology the plant considered is the nth plant in a series of applications. This report presents the results of an economic comparison of this technology with other power generation technologies that use coal. Technologies evaluated were:Co-Processing integrated with simple cycle combustion turbine generators, (CSC); Co-Processing integrated with combined cycle combustion turbine generators, (CCC); pulverized coal-fired boiler with flue gas desulfurization and steam turbine generator, (PC) and Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine generator, (CFB). Conceptual designs were developed. Designs were based on approximately equivalent net electrical output for each technology. A base case of 310 MWe net for each technology was established. Sensitivity analyses at other net electrical output sizes varying from 220 MWe's to 1770 MWe's were also performed. 4 figs., 9 tabs.
Research Organization:
Ohio Clean Fuels, Inc., Etobicoke, ON (Canada); Stone and Webster Management Consultants, Inc., Houston, TX (USA)
Sponsoring Organization:
DOE/FE
DOE Contract Number:
FC22-88PC79797
OSTI ID:
6266153
Report Number(s):
DOE/PC/79797-T3; ON: DE91002609
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English