Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Ventilation strategies for different climates

Conference ·
OSTI ID:6053442
Until recently, residential ventilation in the United States has been provided by infiltration. In this report we compare natural ventilation (ventilation by infiltration) with several mechanical ventilation strategies and examine the overall energy consumption associated with these strategies in different climatic regions in the US. The strategies examined are: natural ventilation, balanced ventilation with an air-to-air heat exchanger, exhaust ventilation without heat recovery, and exhaust ventilation with heat recovery via a heat pump. Two strategies for utilizing the heat pump output for domestic hot water are examined. One heat pump strategy employs exhaust fan reversal to provide space cooling whenever possible during the summer months. A modified TRNSYS residential load model incorporating the LBL infiltration model, an algorithm to calculate effective ventilation, and a modified TRNSYS domestic hot water model are used to simulate the energy consumption associated with each strategy. The domestic hot water model is used to determine the useful heat supplied by an exhaust ventilation heat pump as a function of daily hot water demand. The simulations indicate that the choice of ventilation strategy can have a significant impact on energy consumption. They show that total end-use energy consumption can be reduced as much by mechanical ventilation as by superinsulation of a house. The comparisons also show that for the same effective ventilation rate, houses with mechanical ventilation systems (especially those with exhaust fans) have been indoor air quality than those that rely on natural ventilation. 19 refs.
Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (USA)
DOE Contract Number:
AC03-76SF00098
OSTI ID:
6053442
Report Number(s):
LBL-20364; CONF-8605301-1; ON: DE87014677
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English