Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Designing and commissioning variable flow hydronic systems

Journal Article · · ASHRAE Journal (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers); (United States)
OSTI ID:6012999
 [1]
  1. Kele and Associates, Memphis, TN (United States)
Direct return variable flow hydronic systems (VFHS) must (in this author's opinion) be designed to be self-balancing. However, in practice, many design engineers will use customary pipe sizing routines, piping detail drawings and specifications that apply to more familiar constant flow systems. Substituting a two-way valve in place of a three-way valve and bypass pipe, while retaining the balancing valve and balancing specification, ultimately creates control problems and wastes energy. The use of balancing valves on VFHS is detrimental to the system's performance because it reduces the authority of the control valve and adds a permanent restriction in every branch. This restriction increases the pumping costs for the life of the building. Specifications for VFHS must stress the importance of the valve actuator and the need for high quality valve bodies to withstand the additional dynamic forces and static pressures that are present in these systems. The working pressures for VFHS are always higher than for equivalent constant flow hydronic systems (CFHS). On many VFHS, the use of conventional HVAC control valves may not be suitable. This article addresses these problems and the important role the balancing contractor has in testing and commissioning these systems.
OSTI ID:
6012999
Journal Information:
ASHRAE Journal (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers); (United States), Journal Name: ASHRAE Journal (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers); (United States) Vol. 35:7; ISSN 0001-2491; ISSN ASHRAA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English