Screening Prosopis (mesquite) species for biofuel production on semi-arid lands. Final report, April 1, 1978-March 30, 1981

Technical Report · Tue Jan 01 04:00:00 EST 1985

DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/6008971· OSTI ID:6008971

Felker, P; Cannell, G H; Clark, P R; Osborn, J F; Nash, P

Arid adapted nitrogen fixing trees and shrubs of the genus Prosopis (mesquite) have been examined for woody biomass production on semi-arid lands of southwestern United States. A germ-plasm collection of 900 accessions from North and South America and Africa was assembled. Field studies screening for biomass production, frost tolerance, response to irrigation, pod production and heat/drought tolerance involved a total of 80 accessions. Selections made from survivors of coal/frost screening trial had more frost tolerance and biomass productivity than prostrate selections from the ranges of Arizona, New Mexico and west Texas. Thirteen Prosopis species were found to nodulate, reduce acetylene to ethylene, and grow on a nitrogen free media in greenhouse experiments. The salinity tolerance of six Prosopis species was examined on a nitrogen free media in greenhouse experiments. No reduction in growth occurred for any species tested at a salinity of 6000 mg NaC1/L which is considered too saline for normal agricultural crops. Individual trees have grown 5 to 7 cm in basal diameter, and 2.0 to 3.7 meters in height per year and have achieved 50 kg oven dry weight per tree in 2 years with 600 mm water application per year. Vegetative propagation techniques have been developed and clones of these highly productive trees have been made. Small pilots on 1.5 x 1.5 m spacing in the California Imperial Valley had a first and second season dry matter production of 11.7 and 16.9 T/ha for P. chilensis (0009), 7.1 and 6.9 T/ha for P. glandulosa var. torreyana (0001), 9.8 and 19.2 T/ha for P. alba (0039) and 7.9 and 14.5 T/ha for progency of a California ornamental (0163). The projected harvested costs of $25.00 per oven dry ton or $1.50 per million Btu's compare favorable with coal and other alternative fuel sources in South Texas.

• Research Organization: California Univ., Riverside (USA). Dept. of Soil and Environmental Sciences
• DOE Contract Number: FG01-78ET20023
• OSTI ID: 6008971
• Report Number(s): DOE/ET/20023-T1; ON: DE85010048
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

09 BIOMASS FUELS
140504* -- Solar Energy Conversion-- Biomass Production & Conversion-- (-1989)
ARID LANDS
BIOCONVERSION
BIOMASS PLANTATIONS
CALIFORNIA
CLONING
COST
CULTIVATION
ENERGY SOURCES
FEASIBILITY STUDIES
FEDERAL REGION IX
FEDERAL REGION VI
FIELD TESTS
FUELS
GROWTH
HARVESTING
IRRIGATION
MESQUITE
NITROGEN FIXATION
NORTH AMERICA
PLANT GROWTH
PLANTS
PRODUCTIVITY
SALINITY
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE
TESTING
TEXAS
TOLERANCE
TREES
USA
VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION
WOOD FUELS