Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Diagenetic cements in transgressive and regressive limestone members on the Stanton Limestone (Upper Pennsylvanian), northern midcontinent

Conference · · Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs; (United States)
OSTI ID:6000689
; ;  [1]
  1. Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (United States). Dept. of Geology

Detailed cathodoluminescent microscopy reveals various types and phases of cement growth preserved in the two limestone members of the Stanton Limestone, which represents a complete cycle of sea level rise and fall during deposition. In the transgressive Captain Creek Limestone Member, early cements are mainly isopachous rims within brachiopods. In the regressive Stoner Limestone Member, early cements are both intergranula rand intragranular isopachous rims in oolitic and skeletal grainstones and in wackestones, as well as non-luminescent syntaxial overgrowths around echinoderm grains. The second phase of cementation in both members consists of luminescence void-filling blocky calcite and syntaxial overgrowths. The latest phase of cementation in both members comprises non-luminescent void-filling and/or replacement ferroan dolomite formed during burial. The early cements are more enriched in Fe and more enriched in Mg than in Sr. However, there seems to be little difference in trace elemental compositions between the transgressive and regressive limestones in general, although certain types of cements confined to one member fall into a relatively small field. The blocky calcites exhibit much higher Fe and Mn content than the early cements. The ferroan dolomite exhibits higher Fe and Mn concentration in the transgressive than in the regressive limestone. The greater abundance of marine cements in the regressive limestone is attributed to greater residence time in high-energy warm marine environments. Differences in Fe and Mn concentration between transgressive and regressive limestone cements are attributed to differences in redox conditions of diagenetic fluids controlled by the offshore Eudora Shale separating these two limestones.

OSTI ID:
6000689
Report Number(s):
CONF-921058--
Journal Information:
Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs; (United States), Journal Name: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs; (United States) Vol. 24:7; ISSN GAAPBC; ISSN 0016-7592
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Diagenetic history of the Stanton Limestone (Missourian, Upper Pennsylvanian) in northern midcontinent
Conference · Sun Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 1993 · Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs; (United States) · OSTI ID:7281398

Pedogenesis and early diagenesis of a marine carbonate platform preceding development of a Chesterian transgressive systems tract
Conference · Tue Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1991 · Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs; (United States) · OSTI ID:5807796

Porosity evolution in Salem Limestone (Mississippian) of south-central Indiana
Conference · Thu Jan 31 23:00:00 EST 1985 · Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol., Bull.; (United States) · OSTI ID:6001384