Cumulative impacts in environmental assessments: How well are they considered
- Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)
- Ohio Univ., Athens, OH (United States)
The authors analyzed 89 environmental assessments published in the Federal Register from January 1 through June 30, 1992, to determine the extent to which their treatment of cumulative impacts met the requirements of 40 CFR 1500-1508. Only 35 (39%) EAs mentioned cumulative impacts. Nineteen EAs addressed cumulative impacts of some resources, but not others. The paper presents several recommendations: (1) past, present and reasonable foreseeable actions that could affect resources affected by the proposed action should be identified at the same time as, and be listed with, the proposed action. (2) for each resource, the discussion of cumulative impacts should follow immediately after the discussion of direct impacts to that resource. (3) conclusions about cumulative impacts should be supported by data and analyses. (4) agencies need a central review function to ensure the quality of their EAs.
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-84OR21400
- OSTI ID:
- 5999833
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-930523--
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Professional; (United States), Journal Name: Environmental Professional; (United States) Vol. Supplement; ISSN 0191-5398; ISSN EPROD9
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Environmental assessment for the deactivation of the N Reactor facilities
Waste Characterization Facility at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Environmental Assessment