Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Common analytical errors in the radiodating of recent sediments

Journal Article · · Environmental Geology and Water Sciences; (USA)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705132· OSTI ID:5948864
 [1]
  1. National Water Research Institute, Ontario (Canada)
Four possible sources of analytical error in the measurement of unsupported {sup 210}Pb and/or nuclear fallout radionuclide (such as {sup 137}Cs) profiles in sediment core are (1) Freezing the entire sediment core prior to precise sectioning; (2) Sectioning the sediment core at room temperature or lower; (3) Determining {sup 210}Pb via its 5.01-day half-life beta emitting daughter {sup 210}Bi; (4) Determining {sup 210}Pb via the 138-day alpha-emitting granddaughter {sup 210}Pb. Simple procedural modifications can substantially improve the quality of analytical data that are subsequently used to develop intricate mathematical models to aid the interpretation of observed radionuclide profiles. These modifications include (1) Always store subsamples for sufficiently long periods of time to ensure equilibrium between {sup 210}Po and unsupported {sup 210}Pb; (2) Always use {sup 208}Po as yield monitor and assay autoplated sources on an alpha-particle counter since the alpha particle energies of {sup 208}Po and {sup 210}Po are separable only on a spectrometer using a detector; (3) Never use any glassware for radiochemical work involved polonium since several polonium compounds are known to absorb onto glass surfaces. Quartz is perhaps the best choice though Teflon or similar materials are also suitable for most situations. Avoid heating above 120 C during HCl leaching and above 90 C during plating since PoCl{sub 4} is highly volatile.
OSTI ID:
5948864
Journal Information:
Environmental Geology and Water Sciences; (USA), Journal Name: Environmental Geology and Water Sciences; (USA) Vol. 14:3; ISSN 0177-5146; ISSN EGWSE
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English