Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of COBRA III-C and SABRE-1 (wire-wrap version) computational results with steady-state data from a 19-pin internally guard heated sodium-cooled bundle with a six-channel central blockage (THORS Bundle 3C). [LMFBR]

Conference ·
OSTI ID:5911606
Computational thermal-hydraulic models of a 19-pin, electrically heated, wire-wrap liquid-metal fast breeder reactor test bundle were developed using two well-known subchannel analysis codes, COBRA III-C and SABRE-1 (wire-wrap version). These two codes use similar subchannel control volumes for the finite difference conservation equations but vary markedly in solution strategy and modeling capability. In particular, the empirical wire-wrap-forced diversion crossflow models are different. Surprisingly, however, crossflow velocity predictions of the two codes are very similar. Both codes show generally good agreement with experimental temperature data from a test in which a large radial temperature gradient was imposed. Differences between data and code results are probably caused by experimental pin bowing, which is presently the limiting factor in validating coded empirical models.
Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)
Sponsoring Organization:
Not Available; USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-26
OSTI ID:
5911606
Report Number(s):
CONF-790816-39
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English