Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Use of plant-specific PRA in an EOP scope audit

Conference · · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society; (United States)
OSTI ID:5854460
 [1]
  1. Yankee Atomic Electric Co., Bolton, MA (United States)
Traditionally, decisions on which accident scenarios to proceduralize as emergency operating procedures (EOPs) have been based on existing design basis analyses, engineering judgment, and probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) on generic plants. This approach has important strengths and limits. The major limitation of generic PRAs is their inability to account for plant-specific features. Use of plant-specific PRA to determine the impact of proceduralizing, or not proceduralizing, responses to scenarios considers plant-specific features. This helps to eliminate unnecessary EOPs, thus allowing resources to be concentrated on scenarios that are more important for a particular plant. In preparation for a US Nuclear Regulatory Commission audit, a plant-specific PRA was used to assess and quantify the plant's previous decision not to implement six reference emergency response guidelines (ERGs) as procedures. The original justification for nonimplementation of the ERGs was based on engineering judgment. The PRA provided a quantitative justification for implementation/nonimplementation of each guidelines. This analysis accounted for plant-specific design features not common to all reference plants.
OSTI ID:
5854460
Report Number(s):
CONF-910603--
Conference Information:
Journal Name: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society; (United States) Journal Volume: 63
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English