skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Tacoma gets the early bus

Journal Article · · AGA Monthly; (United States)
OSTI ID:5837606

What happened, then, when Tacoma, Washington and Seattle each set about choosing an alternative bus fuel in the interests of clean air Not what you'd think. In a major role reversal, Seattle got headaches, while Tacoma got the distinction of being a national pioneer. That's because it was Tacoma that chose natural gas. Ron Shipley is director of maintenance for Pierce Transit, the 11-year-old municipal corporation that runs buses in Tacoma's Pierce County. He remembers getting a call from a representative of Washington Natural Gas (WNG) in the mid-1980s. WNG was trying to cultivate interest in natural gas vehicles. The two busses were placed in service in November 1986. After a three-year initial evaluation period, Pierce County Transit drew up a report indicating it was pleased with the results this far and optimistic about the use of natural gas as a motor fuel. The company calculated a break-even of 68 cents per gallon, meaning that when diesel was at the price or above, natural gas used in its place was a money-saver. By January of this year, diesel was at $1.10 per gallon. This paper reports that emissions were not tested because of the expense involved and the fact that future conversions would use a different technology. Shipley doubted, anyway, that the 60-40 combination would quite meet the emissions standards then in effect for 1991. But is was clear at a glance that particulate matter - the biggest pollution threat from diesel buses - had been significantly reduced. And that good start encouraged Pierce Transit management to plan for a fleet of vehicles that could burn 100 percent natural gas.

OSTI ID:
5837606
Journal Information:
AGA Monthly; (United States), Vol. 73:10; ISSN 0002-8584
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English