Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

EPA's bubble concept after Chevron v. NRDC: who is to guard the guards themselves

Journal Article · · Nat. Resour. Lawyer; (United States)
OSTI ID:5831218
In Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984 the Supreme Court upheld the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate regulations permitting existing industries to modify their plants without installing pollution control equipment so long as there is no net increase in the total amount of pollution emanating from those plants. This article reaches no conclusion about the wisdom of the Supreme Court's analysis; rather, it simply accepts the decision as inevitable under the current design of the Clean Air Act. Although the two-part design of ambient standards plus technology-based standards appears intuitively simple, the effective implementation of the strategy requires repeated congressional intervention resulting in an increasingly complex statute. The bubble concept is only one example of a route by which this statutory design can be weakened. It also highlights the existence of statutory gap that must now be addressed by Congress. While numerous writers have applauded the economic benefits of the market-based approaches to pollution control, such approaches are sound also because of their greater likelihood of success. The construction of some new sources of pollution may escape the installation of the latest pollution controls. The overall integrity of the program, however, will more effectively withstand challenge and achieve more environmental goals in the long term. 157 references.
Research Organization:
Grove, Jaskiewicz, Gillram and Cobert, Washington, DC
OSTI ID:
5831218
Journal Information:
Nat. Resour. Lawyer; (United States), Journal Name: Nat. Resour. Lawyer; (United States) Vol. 17:4; ISSN NRLAD
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English