Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Risk with energy from conventional and nonconventional sources

Journal Article · · Science; (United States)

Risk to human health was compared for five conventional and six nonconventional energy systems. The entire cycle for producing energy was considered, not just part. The most important conclusion drawn is that the risk to human health from nonconventional sources can be as high as, or even higher than, that of conventional sources. This result is produced only when the risk per unit energy is considered, rather than the risk per solar panel or windmill. The risk from nonconventional energy sources derives from the large amount of material and labor needed, along with their backup and storage requirements. Risk evaluation is a relatively new discipline, and therefore the results presented here can be considered only a beginning. However, society should keep relative risk in mind when evaluating present and future energy sources. 18 references, 7 figures.

Research Organization:
Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Ontario
OSTI ID:
5810527
Journal Information:
Science; (United States), Journal Name: Science; (United States) Vol. 203; ISSN SCIEA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Letters/energy: calculating the risk
Journal Article · Fri May 04 00:00:00 EDT 1979 · Science (Washington, D.C.); (United States) · OSTI ID:5503740

Energy risk analysis and data collection
Conference · Mon Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1979 · OSTI ID:5408642

Assessing occupational health and safety risks of renewable-energy technologies at the national level
Conference · Wed Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1980 · OSTI ID:6329420