Nuclear arms threat: psychosocial correlates of attitudes and behavioral response
Why do some Americans believe a mutual (US-USSR) freeze on nuclear weapons production is the best way to prevent nuclear war, while others believe the strengthening of America's nuclear arsenal is the best answer. This study examined four psychological variables - dogmatism, intolerance of ambiguity, rigidity, and conformity - that might differentiate individuals with these opposing views. Also examined was the question of why some citizens are more actively engaged in peace activity than others. Subjects for the first part of the study were 146 student volunteers, predominantly undergraduate, from San Diego State University. Thirty-eight students were in favor of additional nuclear arms, while 108 advocated the freeze. The 108 subjects in the freeze group were also used in the second part of the study involving peace activity. In addition, a sample of 47 volunteers from various peace organizations in San Diego County were used to form a peace group. As predicted, individuals favoring a nuclear arms build-up were found to be significantly more rigid and conforming than individuals favoring a mutual freeze. However, no differences in dogmatism or intolerance of ambiguity were found between the two groups. With regard to peace activity, the results indicated that measures of locus of control were not significantly related to anti-nuclear activity, even when political ideology was taken into account. The highly activist peace group was found, however, to be significantly less conforming than the relatively non-activist freeze group.
- Research Organization:
- California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, CA (USA)
- OSTI ID:
- 5776896
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: Thesis (Ph. D.)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Legacy of insecurity, a reservoir of hope: the psychosocial impact and developmental implications of the threat of nuclear war on adolescents
Barriers to communication and cooperation in addressing community impacts of radioactive releases from research facilities