Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Hazard pay for workers: risk and reward

Journal Article · · Environment; (United States)
The second in a series of articles on the differences between worker protection from hazards and that provided for the general public deals with worker reimbursement for job-associated risks. The justification for higher pay is based on market place economic theory that assumes a free choice of occupations, but overlooks skill, bargaining power, and regional variations as contributing factors. A debate is emerging over the concept of putting a dollar value on human life through either the discounted future earnings (DFE) or the willingness to pay (WTP) approach because some individuals are undervalued and because people respond to certain death differently than to statistical risk. As an alternative to extra compensation, employers can elect to make the work environment safer. The difference is one in which society values worker health over choice. Comparisons of actuarial risk data to test the doctrine of equalizing differences continue to be inconclusive and disparate in their results. A review of the literature confirms compensation only for the risk of death and opens up several questions about the level and uniformity of compensation and the definition of risk. 22 references, 3 tables. (DCK)
Research Organization:
Clark Univ., CENTED, Worcester, MA
OSTI ID:
5775693
Journal Information:
Environment; (United States), Journal Name: Environment; (United States) Vol. 23:8; ISSN ENVTA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English