Probability of failure of the waste hoist brake system at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)

Technical Report · Thu Jan 01 04:00:00 EST 1998

DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/573120· OSTI ID:573120

Greenfield, M A ^[1]; Sargent, T J ^[2]

---

1. Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)
2. Univ. of Chicago, IL (United States)

In its most recent report on the annual probability of failure of the waste hoist brake system at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), the annual failure rate is calculated to be 1.3E({minus}7)(1/yr), rounded off from 1.32E({minus}7). A calculation by the Environmental Evaluation Group (EEG) produces a result that is about 4% higher, namely 1.37E({minus}7)(1/yr). The difference is due to a minor error in the US Department of Energy (DOE) calculations in the Westinghouse 1996 report. WIPP`s hoist safety relies on a braking system consisting of a number of components including two crucial valves. The failure rate of the system needs to be recalculated periodically to accommodate new information on component failure, changes in maintenance and inspection schedules, occasional incidents such as a hoist traveling out-of-control, either up or down, and changes in the design of the brake system. This report examines DOE`s last two reports on the redesigned waste hoist system. In its calculations, the DOE has accepted one EEG recommendation and is using more current information about the component failures rates, the Nonelectronic Parts Reliability Data (NPRD). However, the DOE calculations fail to include the data uncertainties which are described in detail in the NPRD reports. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission recommended that a system evaluation include mean estimates of component failure rates and take into account the potential uncertainties that exist so that an estimate can be made on the confidence level to be ascribed to the quantitative results. EEG has made this suggestion previously and the DOE has indicated why it does not accept the NRC recommendation. Hence, this EEG report illustrates the importance of including data uncertainty using a simple statistical example.

• Research Organization: Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, NM (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)
• DOE Contract Number: AC04-89AL58309
• OSTI ID: 573120
• Report Number(s): EEG--65; ON: DE98004011
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

05 NUCLEAR FUELS
BRAKES
DESIGN
EVALUATED DATA
FAILURES
HOISTS
MODIFICATIONS
PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION
RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
SAFETY ANALYSIS
WIPP