Airborne lead: a clearcut case of differential protection

Journal Article · Fri Jan 01 04:00:00 EST 1982 · Environment; (United States)

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1982.9932462· OSTI ID:5675954

Hattis, D R; Goble, R; Ashford, N

Society imposes differential protection from airborne lead, allowing a greater exposure for workers than for the general public. A comparison of social values for worker and public protection examines the origins, justifications, and the legal and economic implications of different standards. A legislative and judicial review of alternative protection methods concludes that the discrepancy derives from the Congressional mandates and not in how agencies use their authority. Agencies appear to have proceeded as far as political limits allow without jeopardizing the Clean Air Act. 45 references, 4 figures, 8 tables.

• Research Organization: Clark Univ., CENTED, Worcester, MA
• OSTI ID: 5675954
• Journal Information: Environment; (United States), Journal Name: Environment; (United States) Vol. 24:1; ISSN ENVTA
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290300 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Environment
Health
& Safety
500200* -- Environment
Atmospheric-- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport-- (-1989)
500600 -- Environment
Atmospheric-- Regulations-- (-1989)
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
AIR POLLUTION
ELEMENTS
HAZARDS
HEALTH HAZARDS
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
LEAD
METALS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
POLLUTION
PUBLIC HEALTH
SAFETY
SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS
STANDARDS