Uranium-isotope systematics in groundwaters of the Rustler Formation, northern Delaware Basin, southeastern New Mexico

Technical Report · Tue Dec 01 04:00:00 EST 1987

DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/5624044· OSTI ID:5624044

Lambert, S. J.; Carter, J. A. ^[1]

---

1. Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)

Values for uranium concentration ((U)) and {sup 234}U/{sup 238}U activity ratio (AR) have been determined for groundwaters and host rocks from the Rustler Formation near the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site. (U) varies from about 0.02 to 40 {times} 10{sup {minus}9} g/g, increasing westward across the WIPP site to Nash Draw, a dissolution valley underlain by outcrops of Rustler Formation evaporites. Large deviations from secular equilibrium (AR {approx} 1) in the groundwaters increase eastward from about 2 to 3 in Nash Draw to almost 12 in the eastern part of the WIPP site. (U) and AR variations cannot be completely explained by simple mixing due to congruent dissolution of uranium from rock (without isotopic fractionation). AR values typically increase along the flow path in a reducing environment, and the observed eastward increase in AR suggests a relict flow system whose dominant flow direction (eastward) was at high angles to that now observed. A westward decrease in AR coupled with a steady increase in (U) indicates not only that there was a change in flow direction since recharge, but that Rustler groundwater is now draining from areas of high potentiometric level low permeability near the WIPP site, without appreciable recharge. The maximum time required for this westward drainage is about 200,000 a. The minimum time required to achieve the highest observed ARs during the earlier episode of eastward flow from recharge in the west is 10,000 to 30,000 a. Radiocarbon and stable-isotope studies of the Rustler Formation near the WIPP indicate that the modern Rustler flow system is not at steady state, recharge being dominated by wetter climatic conditions in the Pleistocene. Uranium-isotope studies are consistent with these results, and further suggest that present flow directions are qualitatively different from those existing at the time of recharge. 36 refs., 17 figs., 3 tabs.

• Research Organization: Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)
• Sponsoring Organization: DOE/DP
• DOE Contract Number: AC04-76DP00789
• OSTI ID: 5624044
• Report Number(s): SAND-87-0388; ON: DE90000928
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

052002* -- Nuclear Fuels-- Waste Disposal & Storage
053000 -- Nuclear Fuels-- Environmental Aspects
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
ACTINIDE ISOTOPES
ACTINIDE NUCLEI
ALPHA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
CLASSIFICATION
ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION
EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI
FEDERAL REGION VI
FLOW RATE
FUNCTIONAL MODELS
GROUND WATER
HEAVY ION DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
HEAVY NUCLEI
HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES
HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS
ISOTOPES
MAGNESIUM 28 DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
MANAGEMENT
MATERIALS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NEON 24 DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
NEW MEXICO
NORTH AMERICA
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
NUCLEI
OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
PILOT PLANTS
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
RADIOACTIVE WASTE FACILITIES
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
RADIOECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION
RADIOISOTOPES
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
UNDERGROUND DISPOSAL
UNDERGROUND FACILITIES
URANIUM 234
URANIUM 238
URANIUM ISOTOPES
US DOE
US ORGANIZATIONS
USA
WASTE DISPOSAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WASTES
WATER
WIPP
YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES