skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Investigation of the Virginia coal industry. Final technical report, May 1, 1984-April 30, 1985

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:5591883

The Virginia coal industry was studied in the context of the Central Appalachian coal markets and competitive coal sources from eastern Kentucky and West Virginia. Production, transportation, and marketing were evaluated, focusing on delivered cost to the user as the key issue in sales. The study concentrated on steam coal sales to Virginia utilities because detailed data were available. The study concludes that since coal quality from all three states is similar, then delivered cost is the key to steam coal sales to Virginia electric utilities. Coal from eastern Kentucky and West Virginia was provided at a lower delivered cost than coal from Virginia. Coal from eastern Kentucky had the lowest FOB mine price, and coal from West Virginia was moved at the lowest transportation costs. Since coal from Virginia had a weighted-average FOB mine cost lower than that from West Virginia, its present disadvantage is in its higher transportation costs. All of the mines involved in the study are served by a single railroad system, and all of the utility plants involved are served by a single railroad system. Lowest transportation costs resulted if the mine and the utility were served by the same rail system. An extra $2 to $3 a ton was required to move the coal 6 to 7 miles to the utility on a second system, as in the case of the Norfolk Southern (NS) switch to the CSX system in Chesterfield. Since the coal producers do not have the margins to absorb this additional cost, the coal delivery competition is between railroads who do. The Virginia coal industry's future is tied inescapably to NS, which transports its coal and determines the delivered costs. Future growth requires that NS meet CSX transportation competition costs in order that Virginia coal can compete with West Virginia and eastern Kentucky coal on the basis of delivered cost. Increased Virginia coal sales require the close cooperation of Virginia coal suppliers, transporters, and users. 5 figs., 91 tabs.

Research Organization:
Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg (USA). Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research
DOE Contract Number:
FG22-84PC72268
OSTI ID:
5591883
Report Number(s):
DOE/PC/72268-5; ON: DE85015592
Resource Relation:
Other Information: Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English