Dark side to light rail: the experience of three new transit systems

Journal Article · · J. Am. Plann. Assoc.; (United States)

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368508976421· OSTI ID:5578374

Gomez-Ibanez, J A

Many medium-size cities are planning or building new light rail transit (LRT) systems, the modern equivalents of streetcars or trolleys. Proponents argue not only that light rail is far less expensive to build than heavy rail, or subway, systems but also that it costs no more to operate than conventional bus transit and offers much improved service. Although it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, the first several years of experience of the new light rail systems in San Diego, Calgary, and Edmonton suggests that proponents have oversold LRT. In all three cities the LRT costs more than the conventional bus service it replaced. Public transit ridership increased modestly in two of the three cities, but the costs per added rider were high. 26 references, 9 tables.

• Research Organization: Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
• OSTI ID: 5578374
• Journal Information: J. Am. Plann. Assoc.; (United States), Journal Name: J. Am. Plann. Assoc.; (United States) Vol. 51:3; ISSN JAPAD
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
291000 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Conservation
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
320202* -- Energy Conservation
Consumption
& Utilization-- Transportation-- Railway
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
ECONOMICS
MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMS
PERFORMANCE
RAILWAYS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
URBAN AREAS
WEIGHT