Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of portable gas chromatographs and passivated canisters for field sampling airborne toxic organic vapors in the United States and the USSR

Journal Article · · Environmental Science and Technology; (United States)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/es00020a012· OSTI ID:5461661
; ;  [1]
  1. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (United States)
Collection of samples in passivated canisters is widely used in analysis of trace volatile organic compounds in air because preconcentration is usually required to detect analytes. Sample integrity can be comprised by deterioration or artifact formation during storage and preconcentration. A laboratory-tested portable gas chromatograph (PGC) equipped with a highly sensitive photoionization detector (PID) equipped with a highly sensitive photoionization detector (PID) offers the advantage of near real-time data without preconcentration, but its limitations as a field-portable instrument must be recognized. This paper presents data produced simultaneously by the canister/TO-14 method and by PGCs. Data were obtained in US and overseas field studies at industrial, hazardous waste, and roadway sites. Field results suggest that a combination of canister and PGC methods offers a synergistic approach to source assessment measurements.
OSTI ID:
5461661
Journal Information:
Environmental Science and Technology; (United States), Journal Name: Environmental Science and Technology; (United States) Journal Issue: 8 Vol. 25:8; ISSN ESTHA; ISSN 0013-936X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English