Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

When [open quote]least-cost[close quote] is wrong

Journal Article · · Fortnightly; (United States)
OSTI ID:5451250
 [1]
  1. RCG/Hagler, Bailly Inc., Arlington, VA (United States)
Utility resource planning has evolved from minimizing the delivered prices of electricity and natural gas to minimizing the cost of delivering energy services to customers. But even this broader objective falls short of the mark, because it continues to focus solely on costs rather than on benefits. There is however, a new test that accounts for all of the costs and benefits associated with integrated utility resource plans. The cost-benefit test proposed here is based on maximizing the collective consumer surplus of the utility's customers, net of external costs, such as those associated with adverse environmental impacts. The test assumes the utility will be allowed to exactly recovery its costs, and thus will only play a catalytic role. However, the test can be expanded to include the effects of such regulatory incentive schemes as shared savings, and indeed, has the potential to serve as a tool for determining the optimal level of such financial incentives. Furthermore, the test is capable of explicitly quantifying the individual effects of the three basic elements that comprise every integrated resource plan (IRP): supply-side resources, demand-side resources, and rate designs. A utility's rate designs are key ingredients of any IRP and deserve the same consideration given supply- and demand-side resources. Unfortunately, this is often not appreciated by utilities or their regulators. Rates are typically designed or modified on the basis of equity considerations and/or political acceptability. Economic efficiency is considered as an afterthought -- if at all. This practice can be wasteful and costly for the utilities and the nation's economy.
OSTI ID:
5451250
Journal Information:
Fortnightly; (United States), Journal Name: Fortnightly; (United States) Vol. 132:1; ISSN FRTNE8
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English