skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: A literature review and synthesis of current knowledge

Abstract

The Health Effects Institute-Asbestos Research assembled an expert Panel to review the literature on asbestos in public and commercial buildings, and make recommendations for future research. The Panel concluded that: (1) Asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in good repair is unlikely to expose general building occupants to fiber concentrations above those found outside such buildings. The added life-time risk of cancer for such occupants in well-maintained buildings appears to be lower than the risks from other pollutants such as radon and environmental tobacco smoke. (2) Janitorial, custodial, maintenance, and renovation workers may disturb or damage ACBM and episodically produce relatively high fiber concentrations; therefore the added life-time cancer risk in such workers may be appreciably higher than the risk to general building occupants. (3) Asbestos removal workers are at the highest risk of potential exposure. Good work practice and respiratory protection are essential to avoid dangerous exposure of such workers. (4) Determining exposure risks and forms of prevention or remediation warranted in a building are site-specific tasks. Uncontrolled disturbance of ACBM should be avoided. In well-maintained buildings, improper removal or improper abatement action can cause persistent increases of fiber levels.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Health Effects Inst., Cambridge, MA (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
5409137
Report Number(s):
PB-92-167261/XAB
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; ASBESTOS; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION; HEALTH HAZARDS; COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS; INDOOR AIR POLLUTION; PUBLIC BUILDINGS; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; AIR POLLUTION MONITORING; MAINTENANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEWS; RISK ASSESSMENT; AIR POLLUTION; BUILDINGS; DOCUMENT TYPES; HAZARDS; MONITORING; POLLUTION; POLLUTION ABATEMENT 540120* -- Environment, Atmospheric-- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport-- (1990-); 290300 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Environment, Health, & Safety; 320107 -- Energy Conservation, Consumption, & Utilization-- Building Systems-- (1987-)

Citation Formats

Not Available. Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: A literature review and synthesis of current knowledge. United States: N. p., 1991. Web.
Not Available. Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: A literature review and synthesis of current knowledge. United States.
Not Available. 1991. "Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: A literature review and synthesis of current knowledge". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_5409137,
title = {Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: A literature review and synthesis of current knowledge},
author = {Not Available},
abstractNote = {The Health Effects Institute-Asbestos Research assembled an expert Panel to review the literature on asbestos in public and commercial buildings, and make recommendations for future research. The Panel concluded that: (1) Asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in good repair is unlikely to expose general building occupants to fiber concentrations above those found outside such buildings. The added life-time risk of cancer for such occupants in well-maintained buildings appears to be lower than the risks from other pollutants such as radon and environmental tobacco smoke. (2) Janitorial, custodial, maintenance, and renovation workers may disturb or damage ACBM and episodically produce relatively high fiber concentrations; therefore the added life-time cancer risk in such workers may be appreciably higher than the risk to general building occupants. (3) Asbestos removal workers are at the highest risk of potential exposure. Good work practice and respiratory protection are essential to avoid dangerous exposure of such workers. (4) Determining exposure risks and forms of prevention or remediation warranted in a building are site-specific tasks. Uncontrolled disturbance of ACBM should be avoided. In well-maintained buildings, improper removal or improper abatement action can cause persistent increases of fiber levels.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1991,
month = 9
}

Technical Report:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that may hold this item. Keep in mind that many technical reports are not cataloged in WorldCat.

Save / Share:
  • The publication contained the necessary forms and requirements for those bidding for asbestos removal projects in public buildings in Oklahoma. Included were the solicitation for bids form, and information concerning the contracting of labor for the treatment of friable asbestos-containing material. The information concerned requirements for site examination, rejection of bids, stipulations to be followed in awarding the contract, general clean-up rules, methods of laying out the work, use of temporary utilities, prevailing wage scale, liquidated damages, required bonds and affidavits, completion and final payment, liability insurance, property insurance, and other contractor obligations. A sample contract was included along withmore » samples of work orders, statutory bonds, performance bonds, defect bonds, bid affidavits, claim or invoice affidavits, notifications, disposal permits, pertinent extracts from the Asbestos Control Act of 1980, copies of sections of the U.S. Department of Labor/Occupational Safety and Health Administration Asbestos Regulations, and copies of relevant Environmental Protection Agency regulations.« less
  • Airborne asbestos levels were measured by direct transmission electron microscopy in 49 public buildings from three categories: (1) buildings without asbestos-containing material (ACM); (2) buildings with all or most of the ACM in good condition allowing for a limited number of areas of moderate damage; and (3) buildings with at least one area of significantly damaged ACM or numerous areas of moderate damage. Although the absolute airborne asbestos levels were very low, Category (3) had the highest median levels followed by Category (2), Category (1), and outdoors. Category (3) levels were significantly higher than Category (1). Another objective was tomore » field test an assessment method for ACM developed facilitate abatement decision making in the context of an asbestos-management program. Using rate consistency as an evaluation criterion, the three factors showed promise as assessment tools for use in the field. Each factor showed statistically significant consistency among raters.« less
  • The paper presents a technical review of the sampling and analytical data cited in the 1985 report to Congress on wastes from the extraction and beneficiation of metallic ore, phosphate rock, Asbestos, overburden from uranium mining, and oil shale. The sampling and analytical results cited in the report to Congress came from three sources: evaluation of management practices for mine solid waste storage, disposal, and treatment; hazardous waste identification and listing support: mining waste study; and characterization of wastewater and solid wastes generated in selected ore mining subcategories (Sbm Hg, Al, V, W, Ni, Tl). For each source, the documentmore » presents a review of the sampling and analysis methodologies, as well as a description of the data collected.« less
  • The purpose of the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies (HFCIT) Program Baseline Knowledge Assessment is to measure the current level of awareness and understanding of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies and the hydrogen economy. This information will be an asset to the HFCIT program in formulating an overall education plan. It will also provide a baseline for comparison with future knowledge and opinion surveys. To assess the current understanding and establish the baseline, the HFCIT program plans to conduct scientific surveys of four target audience groups--the general public, the educational community, governmental agencies, and potential large users. The purposemore » of the literature review is to examine the literature and summarize the results of surveys that have been conducted in the recent past concerning the existing knowledge and attitudes toward hydrogen. This literature review covers both scientific and, to a lesser extent, non-scientific polls. Seven primary data sources were reviewed, two of which were studies based in Europe. Studies involved both closed-end and open-end questions; surveys varied in length from three questions to multi-page interviews. Populations involved in the studies were primarily adults, although one study involved students. The number of participants ranged from 13 to over 16,000 per study. In addition to the primary surveys, additional related studies were mined for pertinent information. The primary conclusions of the surveys reviewed are that the public knows very little about hydrogen and fuel cell technologies but is generally accepting of the potential for hydrogen use. In general, respondents consider themselves as environmentally conscious. The public considers safety as the primary issue surrounding hydrogen as a fuel. Price, performance, and convenience are also considerations that will have major impacts on purchase decisions.« less