Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Sulfur dioxide emission control by furnace injection of a dry sorbent. Phase III. Economic assessment. Final report

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:5363058

An economic analysis evaluating furnace injection of dry calcium-based sorbent to reduce SO/sub 2/ emissions from lignite-fired utility boilers indicates economic advantage for purchase of lime with on-site pressure hydration. This sorbent processing option requires capital expenditure for on-site hydration equipment, but those costs are more than offset by the lower unit cost of lime (relative to purchased pressure-hydrate). On-site calcination is economically viable only for retrofits requiring greater than 500 tons per day of lime. The economic advantage for purchase of lime with on-site hydration exists for both easy and difficult retrofit situations and for retrofits designed to achieve either 50 or 70% SO/sub 2/ removal. The study also includes an economic sensitivity analysis evaluating several system parameters. Included are boiler size, boiler capacity factor, coal sulfur content, sorbent unit cost and calcium utilization efficiency. The final portion of the study provides a comparison of sorbent injection SO/sub 2/ removal costs with the cost of SO/sub 2/ control by wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD). For 1.2% sulfur, lignite-fired boilers retrofit of furnace sorbent injection to obtain SO/sub 2/ control equivalent to EPA's New Source Performance Standard will cost at least $600 per ton SO/sub 2/ less than FGD.

Research Organization:
Energy and Environmental Research Corp., Irvine, CA (USA)
DOE Contract Number:
AC21-84FC10616
OSTI ID:
5363058
Report Number(s):
DOE/FC/10616-2130; ON: DE86015095
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English