Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

The value of immunoscintigraphy for the operative retreatment of colorectal cancer. Limitations of a new diagnostic method

Journal Article · · Cancer (Philadelphia); (USA)
In 42 patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer, results of conventional diagnostic methods were compared with those of immunoscintigraphy. In 69% of all cases, the intraoperative findings of a second-look operation served for validation, whereas in 31% close follow-up was used. Recurrent tumors were successfully localized in 83% of patients by conventional methods, whereas immunoscintigraphy was expressive in 57% of cases. Immunoscintigraphy was disappointing especially because of its low sensitivity (23%) and low predictive value (positive, 33%; negative, 37%) with regard to successful diagnosis of extrahepatic tumors compared with the results of conventional methods (77% sensitivity; positive, 94%; negative, 79%). The rate of false-positive results was relatively high with immunoscintigraphy (n = 12), 83% of which were related to extrahepatic recurrent tumors. The value of immunoscintigraphy using an immunococktail of 131-I-labeled F(ab')2 fragments of monoclonal antibodies against CEA, with Ca 19-9 as an additional diagnostic tool for early detection of recurrent colorectal cancer, must therefore be viewed critically.
OSTI ID:
5361251
Journal Information:
Cancer (Philadelphia); (USA), Journal Name: Cancer (Philadelphia); (USA) Vol. 64:4; ISSN 0008-543X; ISSN CANCA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English