Comparative evaluation of surface and downhole steam-generation techniques
Conference
·
OSTI ID:5352349
It has long been recognized that the application of heat to reservoirs containing high API gravity oils can substantially improve recovery. Although steam injection is currently the principal thermal recovery method, heat transmission losses associated with delivery of the steam from the surface generators to the oil-bearing formation has limited conventional steam injection to shallow reservoirs. The objective of the Department of Energy's Project DEEP STEAM is to develop the technology required to economically produce heavy oil from deep reservoirs. The tasks included in this effort are the development and evaluation of thermally efficient delivery systems and downhole steam generation systems. This paper compares the technical and economic performance of conventional surface steam drives, which are strongly influenced by heat losses, with (a) thermally efficient delivery (through insulated strings) of surface generated steam, (b) low pressure combustion downhole steam generation, (c) high pressure combustion downhole steam generation using air as the oxygen source, and (d) high pressure combustion downhole steam generation substituting pure oxygen for air. The selection of a preferred technology based upon either total efficiency or cost is found to be strongly influenced by reservoir depth, steam mass flow rate, and sandface steam quality. Therefore, a parametric analysis has been performed which examines varying depths, injection rates and steam qualities. Results indicate that the technologies are not readily distinguishable for low injectivity reservoirs in which conventional steam drives are feasible. However, high injection rates produce a notable cost difference between high pressure combustion systems and the other technologies. Issues that must be addressed before gaining further insight into the economic viability of downhole steam generation are discussed.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC04-76DP00789
- OSTI ID:
- 5352349
- Report Number(s):
- SAND-81-2244C; CONF-820419-1; ON: DE82011136
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Comparative evaluation of surface and downhold steam generation techniques
Comparative analysis of steam delivery cost for surface and downhole steam drive technologies
Update of comparative analysis of steam delivery costs for surface and downhole steam drive technologies
Conference
·
Thu Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1981
· Soc. Pet. Eng. AIME, Pap.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6468694
Comparative analysis of steam delivery cost for surface and downhole steam drive technologies
Technical Report
·
Thu Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 1981
·
OSTI ID:5996561
Update of comparative analysis of steam delivery costs for surface and downhole steam drive technologies
Technical Report
·
Sat Mar 31 23:00:00 EST 1984
·
OSTI ID:6886678
Related Subjects
02 PETROLEUM
020300* -- Petroleum-- Drilling & Production
AIR
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
COST
ELEMENTS
ENERGY SOURCES
ENHANCED RECOVERY
FLOW RATE
FLUID INJECTION
FLUIDS
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
GASES
NONMETALS
OIL WELLS
OXYGEN
PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
PRESSURE DEPENDENCE
RECOVERY
STEAM INJECTION
STIMULATION
THERMAL RECOVERY
WELL STIMULATION
WELLS
020300* -- Petroleum-- Drilling & Production
AIR
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
COST
ELEMENTS
ENERGY SOURCES
ENHANCED RECOVERY
FLOW RATE
FLUID INJECTION
FLUIDS
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
GASES
NONMETALS
OIL WELLS
OXYGEN
PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
PRESSURE DEPENDENCE
RECOVERY
STEAM INJECTION
STIMULATION
THERMAL RECOVERY
WELL STIMULATION
WELLS