DOE cost comparison study: industrial fluidized bed combustion vs conventional coal technology
Technical Report
·
OSTI ID:5294393
This study compares the capital and operating costs of two different industrial boiler technologies, each producing 250,000 lbs steam/hr: Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC) and Pulverized Coal (PC) combustion used in conjunction with a limestone Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) system. Three separate turnkey plant designs have been completed. Two of these plant designs incorporate FBC technology and have been designated FBA-16 and FBV-16. The first FBC design (FBA-16) contains two shop assembled, rail-shippable, fluid-bed boilers capable of producing 125,000 lbs/h each. The second plant design (FBV-16) utilizes a single fluid bed boiler shipped by rail in large sections for field assembly. This single unit is capable of producing 250,000 lbs/h. The third plant design utilizes a conventional pulverized coal (PC) boiler used in conjunction with a C-E Air Quaity Control System (AQCS) limestone scrubber. The FBA-16 and FBV-16 fluid bed designs were found to be competitive with the conventional unit. Capital costs were generated for the three turnkey plant designs just described. The FBA-16, FBV-16, and Conventional Unit plant designs have associated capital costs of $24.4, $22.8, and $24.7 million, respectively. A substantial cost reduction can be realized for plant capacities less than 180,000 lbs steam/h by incorporating a single FBA-16 type boiler. The operating costs for the bed designs are close enough to be considered similar when considering the nature of the study. The efficiency of the fluid bed plant designs can be increased and required capital equipment reduced by improvements to the plant design. Some potential design modifications are outlined. Extensive design and background research was prformed to increase the validity and relevance of this report.
- Research Organization:
- Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, CT (USA). Power Systems Group
- OSTI ID:
- 5294393
- Report Number(s):
- FE-2473-T7
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
DOE cost comparison study industrial fluidized bed combustion vs conventional coal technology
Preliminary design and assessment of circulating-bed boilers. Final report
FBC feasibility study. Volume 2. Task 4, Final report. Export trade information
Technical Report
·
Tue Jan 01 23:00:00 EST 1980
·
OSTI ID:5656381
Preliminary design and assessment of circulating-bed boilers. Final report
Technical Report
·
Sun Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1980
·
OSTI ID:5268614
FBC feasibility study. Volume 2. Task 4, Final report. Export trade information
Technical Report
·
Sun Dec 17 23:00:00 EST 1989
·
OSTI ID:7148862
Related Subjects
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT
014000 -- Coal
Lignite
& Peat-- Combustion
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
200108 -- Fossil-Fueled Power Plants-- Fuels-- (1980-)
42 ENGINEERING
421000* -- Engineering-- Combustion Systems
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
COAL
COMBUSTION
COMBUSTORS
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
DATA
DATA FORMS
ECONOMICS
ENERGY SOURCES
ENGINEERING
FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTION
FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTORS
FOSSIL FUELS
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FUELS
INFORMATION
NUMERICAL DATA
OXIDATION
POWER PLANTS
TABLES
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
014000 -- Coal
Lignite
& Peat-- Combustion
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
200108 -- Fossil-Fueled Power Plants-- Fuels-- (1980-)
42 ENGINEERING
421000* -- Engineering-- Combustion Systems
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
COAL
COMBUSTION
COMBUSTORS
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
DATA
DATA FORMS
ECONOMICS
ENERGY SOURCES
ENGINEERING
FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTION
FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTORS
FOSSIL FUELS
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FUELS
INFORMATION
NUMERICAL DATA
OXIDATION
POWER PLANTS
TABLES
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES