Public reaction to imposed risk
Implicit in every nonarbitrary government decision on the use of technology is a trade-off of a certain amount of risk in return for societal benefits. However, the assessment of this risk is often frustrated, not only by inadequate experience and by incomplete knowledge of the causality of environmental impacts, but also by a disparity between individual and societal views of risk. While the societal view is based on quantitative methods and objective risk functions, and on net societal benefit, individuals tend to rely on subjective judgment, and consider the distribution as well as the amount of benefit. The resultant biases in the way individuals perceive risk are key to the viability of any policy decision, and thus must be considered in determining the future course of research in risk assessment.
- Research Organization:
- California Univ., Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore National Lab.
- DOE Contract Number:
- W-7405-ENG-48
- OSTI ID:
- 5266465
- Report Number(s):
- UCRL-84839; CONF-800849-1
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
An overview of risk-benefit analysis in environmental law
Ecological risk assessment benefits environmental management