EPA compromises consistency in its coastal oil and gas industry cost-effectiveness analysis
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis to estimate the cost of complying with each newly proposed set of industrial effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs). CE is defined as the incremental annualized cost of a pollution control option in an industry per incremental pound equivalent (PE) of pollutant removed annually by that control options. EPA`s guidelines for conducting the CE analysis require that all costs be expressed in 1981 dollars so that comparison to other industries can be done on a consistent basis. In the results of its CE analyses, EPA presents information showing $/PE values for all the industries for which it has done the CE analysis. These examples indicate that EPA is interested in maintaining consistency and comparability. EPA is not legally bound by the results of a CE analysis; however, if the $/PE for a proposed ELG is calculated to be significantly higher than the $/PEs for other comparable ELGs, EPA might reconsider its proposal. EPA`s approach of using an expanded pollutant list and revised weighting factors probably generates a more accurate estimate of the PEs removed for the coastal oil and gas industry, but in doing so, EPA loses the ability to equitably compare this CE analysis to the CE analyses that have been done for other industries. This shortcoming is particularly obvious since the offshore Ce analysis, evaluating a nearly identical waste stream, was completed just two years earlier. Given EPA`s concern over consistency and comparability to other industries, it may be appropriate to modify this approach for the coastal CE analysis. Another alternative that would allow EPA to reflect the newest toxicological information and still preserve consistency and comparability would be to recalculate all earlier CE analyses whenever new weighting factors are developed.
- Research Organization:
- Argonne National Lab., Washington, DC (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy, Washington, DC (United States)
- DOE Contract Number:
- W-31109-ENG-38
- OSTI ID:
- 510302
- Report Number(s):
- ANL/EAD/PP--86966; ON: DE97008057
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Analysis of EPA`s cost-effectiveness study for the coastal oil and gas effluent limitations guidelines
Cost effectiveness analysis of final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the coastal subcategory of the oil and gas extraction point source category
Cost-effectiveness analysis for proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the coastal subcategory of the oil and gas extraction point source category
Technical Report
·
Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1995
·
OSTI ID:74173
Cost effectiveness analysis of final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the coastal subcategory of the oil and gas extraction point source category
Technical Report
·
Tue Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996
·
OSTI ID:442347
Cost-effectiveness analysis for proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the coastal subcategory of the oil and gas extraction point source category
Technical Report
·
Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1994
·
OSTI ID:39578