Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Old and the new in seismic deconvolution and wavelet estimation

Journal Article · · Geophys. Prospect.; (United States)
 [1];
  1. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd., Calgary, Can.

Various seismic deconvolution operators can be determined by estimating a seismic wavelet and subsequently designing an appropriate inverse filter which converts the wavelet to a spike. Seismic wavelets and deconvolution operators must be estimated in a time adaptive sense due to the nonstationarity of the seismic trace. The wavelet estimation methods considered either use the assumption of a minimum phase wavelet and a random impulse response, or the assumption that the wavelet cepstrum is readily separable from the cepstrum of the seismic trace. The former assumption is required in using the Hilbert transform and Wiener-Levinson wavelet estimations, while the latter assumption is used in homomorphic deconvolution. These wavelet estimates can be used in the design of multichannel Wiener and Kalman deconvolution operators. Multichannel usage of homomorphic deconvolution can also be implemented through various types of cepstral stacking. The discussion of deconvolution filter design focuses on the problems of filter length degree of prewhitening and nonstationarity. In designing time adaptive deconvolution filters, the autocorrelation function can be used to monitor the nonstationarity of the seismic trace. The autocorrelation function, which is used in the computation of least squares inverse filters, can be estimated in an optimum fashion by using the maximum entropy method. Differences between minimum phase Wiener deconvolution and maximum entropy deconvolution become more pronounced for shorter data gates. As a result the maximum entropy approach is preferred for time adaptive deconvolution. The performance of various wavelet estimators and inverse filters is discussed using real and synthetic seismic data. Discussions of homomorphic deconvolution and maximum entropy prediction error filtering are merged with descriptions of conventional approaches to deconvolution.

OSTI ID:
5086533
Journal Information:
Geophys. Prospect.; (United States), Journal Name: Geophys. Prospect.; (United States) Vol. 25:3; ISSN GPPRA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Digital seismic inverse methods
Book · Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1983 · OSTI ID:6306412

The discrete Kalman filtering approach for seismic signals deconvolution
Journal Article · Wed Jun 20 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · AIP Conference Proceedings · OSTI ID:22068979

Adaptive predictive deconvolution of seismic data
Journal Article · Wed Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1977 · Geophys. Prospect.; (United States) · OSTI ID:7086565