Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of the long-time corrosion behavior of certain Zr alloys in PWR, BWR, and laboratory tests

Conference ·
OSTI ID:479467
;  [1];  [2]
  1. Siemens AG, Erlangen (Germany). Power Generation Group
  2. Siemens Power Corp., Richland, WA (United States). Nuclear Div.

Laboratory corrosion tests have always been an important tool for Zr alloy development and optimization. However, it must be known whether a test is representative for the application in-reactor. To shed more light on this question, coupons of several Zr alloys were exposed under isothermal conditions in BWR and PWR type environments. For evaluation of the in-PWR tests and for comparison of out-of-pile and in-pile tests, the different temperatures and times were normalized to a temperature-independent normalized time by assuming an activation temperature (Q/R) of 14,200 K. Comparison of in-PWR and out-of-pile corrosion behavior of Zircaloy shows that corrosion deviates to higher values in PWR if a weight gain of about 50 mg/dm{sup 2} is exceeded. In the case of the Zr2.5Nb alloy, a slight deviation of corrosion as compared to laboratory results starts in PWR only above a weight gain of 100 mg/dm{sup 2}. In BWR, corrosion of Zircaloy is enhanced early in time if compared with out-of-pile. Zr2.5Nb exhibits higher corrosion results in BWR than Zircaloy-4. Alloying chemistry and material condition affect corrosion of Zr alloys. However, several of the material parameters have shown a different ranking in the different environments. Nevertheless, several material parameters influencing in-reactor corrosion like the second phase particle (SPP) size of in-PWR behavior as the Sn and Fe content can be optimized by out-of-pile corrosion tests.

OSTI ID:
479467
Report Number(s):
CONF-950926--
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English