The Cook Mountain problem: Stratigraphic reality and semantic confusion
- Frontera Exploration Consultants, San Antonio, TX (United States)
Historical inconsistency as to what constitutes the Cook Mountain Formation illustrates the semantic confusion resulting from extending surface-derived stratigraphic names into the subsurface without a full understanding of basin architecture. At the surface, the Cook Mountain Formation consists of fossilerous marine shale, glaucony and marl, and marginal-marine sandstone and shale between the nonmarine Sparta Formation sandstones below and the nonmarine Yegua Formation sandstones and lignitic shales above. Fossils are abundant, including the benthic foraminifer Ceratobulimina eximia. As subsurface exploration began, the first occurrence of Ceratobulimina eximia {open_quotes}Cerat{close_quotes} was used as the top of the marine {open_quotes}Cook Mountain Shale{close_quotes} below the Yegua section. Downdip, the overlying Yegua was found to become a sequence of marine shales and marginal-marine sandstones, the lower part of which yielded {open_quotes}Cerat{close_quotes}. Because of this, the lower sandstones were called {open_quotes}Cook Mountain{close_quotes} in many fields. At the Yegua shelf margin, {open_quotes}Cerat{close_quotes} is absent. Different exploration teams have used their own definitions for {open_quotes}Cook Mountain{close_quotes}, leading to substantial confusion.
- OSTI ID:
- 45193
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-941065--
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Surface to subsurface correlation of the Claiborne and Jackson Groups, Colorado River to Trinity River
Stratigraphy, depositional history, and reservoir potential of Cretaceous and early Tertiary rocks of Lower Cook Inlet, Alaska