Double ionization: a reply to the comments of Byron, Joachain, and van der Wiel

Journal Article · Sat Dec 01 04:00:00 EST 1973 · J. Phys., B (London), v. 6, no. 12, pp. L378-L380

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/6/12/010· OSTI ID:4341585

Tweed, R J

Byron et al (J. Phys. B. Atom. Molec. Phys.; 6: 357 (1973)) threw doubt on previous work of the present author (Tweed, J. Phys. B. Atom. Molec. Phys.; 6: 256 to 69 and 270 to 85 (1973)) concerning double ionization of helium- like atoms by high energy electron impact. It is agreed that, on the basis of experimental evidence, the factor of three, previously given, must be spurious. The reasoning which leads to this factor is again considered. (UK)

• Research Organization: Univ., Brest, France
• NSA Number: NSA-29-022297
• OSTI ID: 4341585
• Journal Information: J. Phys., B (London), v. 6, no. 12, pp. L378-L380, Journal Name: J. Phys., B (London), v. 6, no. 12, pp. L378-L380; ISSN JPBAB
• Country of Publication: United Kingdom
• Language: English

Related Subjects

*HELIUM-- ELECTRON-ATOM COLLISIONS
CHARGE EXCHANGE
CHARGE-EXCHANGE REACTIONS
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
ELECTRON COLLISIONS
ENERGY LOSSES
N60400* --Physics (Atomic & Molecular)--Collision Phenomena