Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Analysis of {ital D}{sup 0}{r_arrow}{ital K{bar K}X} decays

Journal Article · · Physical Review, D
; ; ; ; ;  [1]; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [2] more »; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [3]; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [4]; ; ; ;  [5]; ; ; ; ; ;  [6]; ; ;  [7]; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [8]; ; ;  [9]; ; ; ; ; ;  [10] « less
  1. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093 (United States)
  2. University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 (United States)
  3. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0390 (United States)
  4. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 (United States)
  5. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 (United States)
  6. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (United States)
  7. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (United States)
  8. University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois 61801 (United States)
  9. Carleton University, Ottawa, K1S 5B6 (CANADA)
  10. McGill University, Montreal, H3A 2T8 (CANADA)
Using data taken with the CLEO II detector, we have studied the decays of the {ital D}{sup 0} to {ital K}{sup +}{ital K}{sup {minus}}, {ital K}{sup 0}{ital {bar K}}{sup 0}, {ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}, {ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{pi}{sup 0}, {ital K}{sup +}{ital K}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup 0}. We present significantly improved results for {ital B}({ital D}{sup 0}{r_arrow}{ital K}{sup +}{ital K}{sup {minus}})=(0.454{plus_minus}0.028{plus_minus}0.035){percent}, {ital B}({ital D}{sup 0}{r_arrow}{ital K}{sup 0}{ital {bar K}}{sup 0})=(0.054{plus_minus}0.012{plus_minus}0.010){percent}, and {ital B}({ital D}{sup 0}{r_arrow}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}})=(0.074{plus_minus}0.010{plus_minus}0.015){percent}, where the first errors are statistical and the second errors are the estimate of our systematic uncertainty. We also present a new upper limit {ital B}({ital D}{sup 0}{r_arrow}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{ital K}{sup 0}{sub {ital S}}{pi}{sup 0}){lt}0.059{percent} at the 90{percent} confidence level and the first measurement of {ital B}({ital D}{sup 0}{r_arrow}{ital K}{sup +}{ital K}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup 0})=(0.14{plus_minus}0.04){percent}. {copyright} {ital 1996 The American Physical Society.}
OSTI ID:
389032
Journal Information:
Physical Review, D, Journal Name: Physical Review, D Journal Issue: 7 Vol. 54; ISSN 0556-2821; ISSN PRVDAQ
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Analysis of D0 -> K anti-K X Decays
Technical Report · Thu Jun 05 20:00:00 EDT 2003 · OSTI ID:813216

Measurements of {ital B}{r_arrow}{ital D}{sup +}{sub {ital s}}{ital X} decays
Journal Article · Wed May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · Physical Review, D · OSTI ID:284038

Measurement of the polarization in the decays {ital B}{sub {ital d}}{r_arrow}{ital J}/{psi}{ital K}{sup *0} and {ital B}{sub {ital s}}{r_arrow}{ital J}/{psi}{phi}
Journal Article · Sun Oct 22 20:00:00 EDT 1995 · Physical Review Letters · OSTI ID:124814