Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A Letter of Intent to Build a MiniBooNE Near Detector: BooNE

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/3019615· OSTI ID:3019615
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [4];  [4];  [5];  [5];  [5];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [7] more »;  [8];  [9] « less
  1. Univ. of Alabama, Birmingham, AL (United States)
  2. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  3. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL (United States)
  4. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
  5. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL (United States)
  6. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  7. Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA (United States)
  8. Central Michigan Univ., Mount Pleasant, MI (United States)
  9. Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mexico (Mexico)
There is accumulating evidence for a difference between neutrino and antineutrino oscillations at the $$\sim 1$$ eV$^2$ scale. The MiniBooNE experiment observes an unexplained excess of electron-like events at low energies in neutrino mode, which may be due, for example, to either a neutral current radiative interaction, sterile neutrino decay, or to neutrino oscillations involving sterile neutrinos and which may be related to the LSND signal. No excess of electron-like events ($$-0.5 \pm 7.8 \pm 8.7$$), however, is observed so far at low energies in antineutrino mode. Furthermore, global 3+1 and 3+2 sterile neutrino fits to the world neutrino and antineutrino data suggest a difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos with significant ($$\sin^22\theta_{\mu \mu} \sim 35%$$) $$\bar \nu_\mu$$ disappearance. In order to test whether the low-energy excess is due to neutrino oscillations and whether there is a difference between $$\nu_\mu$$ and $$\bar \nu_\mu$$ disappearance, we propose building a second MiniBooNE detector at (or moving the existing MiniBooNE detector to) a distance of $$\sim 200$$ m from the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) production target. With identical detectors at different distances, most of the systematic errors will cancel when taking a ratio of events in the two detectors, as the neutrino flux varies as $1/r^2$ to a calculable approximation. This will allow sensitive tests of oscillations for both $$\nu_e$$ and $$\bar \nu_e$$ appearance and $$\nu_\mu$$ and $$\bar \nu_\mu$$ disappearance. Furthermore, a comparison between oscillations in neutrino mode and antineutrino mode will allow a sensitive search for CP and CPT violation in the lepton sector at short baseline ($$\Delta m^2 > 0.1$$ eV$^2$).
Research Organization:
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
DOE Contract Number:
AC02-07CH11359;
OSTI ID:
3019615
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-LOI--2009-02; oai:inspirehep.net:833934; arXiv:0910.2698
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

An Expression of Interest to Build a MiniBooNE Near Detector: BooNE
Technical Report · Tue May 26 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · OSTI ID:2571223

A Combined $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e$ and $\bar \nu_\mu \rightarrow \bar \nu_e$ Oscillation Analysis of the MiniBooNE Excesses
Journal Article · Thu Jul 19 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · OSTI ID:1336409

Event Excess in the MiniBooNE Search for $\bar \nu_\mu \rightarrow \bar \nu_e$ Oscillations
Journal Article · Thu Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Phys.Rev.Lett. · OSTI ID:1892201