Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Designing Cost‐Effective Carbon Payments to Induce Cellulosic Feedstock Production for Sustainable Aviation Fuel

Journal Article · · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70025· OSTI ID:2997909
Perennial bioenergy crops, such as miscanthus and switchgrass, and crop residues have the potential to scale up sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production and mitigate carbon emissions. However, high establishment costs, delayed returns, and risk–return profiles that diverge from those of conventional crops can hinder incentives to adopt bioenergy crops. We develop an economic model that incorporates spatially varying joint yield and price distributions for the multiple crop choices a farmer faces and apply it to examine the incentives for risk-averse, present-biased, and credit-constrained farmers to produce cellulosic feedstocks under various biomass prices. We link this model to a biogeochemical model to quantify the spatially varying carbon mitigation benefits from these feedstocks in the rainfed region of the United States. We also analyze the cost-effectiveness of two carbon payment policies: annual and upfront. We find that risk-averse, present-biased, or credit-constrained farmers prefer to grow the lower-yielding but less risky switchgrass and harvest corn stover instead of the lower carbon, higher-yielding but riskier feedstock miscanthus, resulting in lower SAF production. Upfront carbon payments incentivize higher quantities of less carbon-intensive SAF production by risk-averse, credit-constrained, and present-biased farmers because they offset a part of the establishment costs of miscanthus. We also find that when farmers are credit-constrained, upfront payments are more cost-effective in terms of carbon mitigation per dollar spent. In contrast, annual payments are more cost-effective when farmers can access credit.
Research Organization:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0018420
OSTI ID:
2997909
Journal Information:
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Journal Name: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy; ISSN 2040-5804; ISSN 2040-5790
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (26)

Carbon mitigation payments can reduce the riskiness of bioenergy crop production
  • Majeed, Fahd; Khanna, Madhu; Miao, Ruiqing
  • Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Vol. 2, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.52
journal April 2023
Contract theory and implications for perennial energy crop contracting journal July 2012
Contracting for perennial energy crops and the cost-effectiveness of the Biomass Crop Assistance Program journal February 2021
What type of landowner would supply marginal land for energy crops? journal August 2014
Costs of meeting a cellulosic biofuel mandate with perennial energy crops: Implications for policy journal May 2017
The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: Impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences journal May 2010
Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land journal January 2021
Assessing Marginal Land Availability Based on Land Use Change Information in the Contiguous United States journal July 2021
Spatially Varying Costs of GHG Abatement with Alternative Cellulosic Feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuels journal June 2024
Cost of Abating Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Cellulosic Ethanol journal February 2015
Impacts of a 32-billion-gallon bioenergy landscape on land and fossil fuel use in the US journal January 2016
Impact of bioenergy feedstock carbon farming on sustainable aviation fuel viability in the United States journal December 2023
The planting real option in cash rent valuation journal February 2012
Quantifying uncertainties in greenhouse gas savings and abatement costs with cellulosic biofuels journal November 2023
Conservation tillage mitigates drought-induced soybean yield losses in the US Corn Belt journal May 2021
Effectiveness of the Biomass Crop Assistance Program: Roles of Behavioral Factors, Credit Constraint, and Program Design journal August 2017
Effects of Ethanol Plant Proximity and Crop Prices on Land‐Use Change in the United States journal July 2018
Where can switchgrass production be more profitable than corn and soybean? An integrated subfield assessment in Iowa, USA journal May 2018
Farmers' heterogeneous perceptions of marginal land for biofuel crops in US Midwestern states considering biophysical and socioeconomic factors journal March 2021
Economic viability and carbon footprint of switchgrass for cellulosic biofuels: Insights from a spatial multi‐feedstock procurement landscape analysis journal May 2021
Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production journal August 2021
Risk aversion and land allocation between annual and perennial crops in semisubsistence farming: a stochastic optimization approach journal April 2019
Enjoy the Joy of Copulas: With a Package copula journal January 2007
2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy report July 2016
Summary of Expansions and Updates in GREET® 2022 report October 2022
Budgetary and Producer Welfare Effects of Revenue Insurance journal August 1997

Similar Records

Carbon mitigation payments can reduce the riskiness of bioenergy crop production
Journal Article · Mon Apr 17 20:00:00 EDT 2023 · Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (JAAEA) · OSTI ID:1970606