Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Reply to {open_quote}{open_quote}Comment on {open_quote}Very weak {gamma} transitions in the {epsilon}/{beta}{sup +} decay of {sup 68}Ga{close_quote}{close_quote}{close_quote}

Journal Article · · Physical Review, C
; ; ; ;  [1]; ; ; ; ;  [2]; ; ; ;  [3];  [4]
  1. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 (United States)
  2. Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 (United States)
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550 (United States)
  4. University of California, Davis, California 95616 (United States)

Using the spectra in the article {open_quote}{open_quote}Very weak {gamma} transitions in the {epsilon}/{beta}{sup +} decay of 68 Ga{close_quote}{close_quote} [D. T. Vo {ital et} {ital al}.. Phys. Rev. C {bold 50}, 1713 (1994)], Skalsey makes an interesting speculation in the accompanying article [M. Skalsey, Phys. Rev. C {bold 54}, 439 (1996), the preceding paper] on the possible existence of a positron feeding with a kinetic endpoint energy of 16 keV in the decay of {sup 68}Ga. Skalsey also points out the facts supporting the {ital e}{sup +} feeding to the 1656-keV level that were not mentioned by Vo {ital et} {ital al}. In this Reply to the Comment, we present information supporting the new {ital e}{sup +} decay to the 1656-keV level and further information on the statistical uncertainties that suggest an even greater skepticism than that shown by Skalsey about the possible existence of the 16-keV {ital e}{sup +} decay to the 1883-keV level upon which he commented. {copyright} {ital 1996 The American Physical Society.}

OSTI ID:
286221
Journal Information:
Physical Review, C, Journal Name: Physical Review, C Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 54; ISSN PRVCAN; ISSN 0556-2813
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English