Retaliation to a chemical attack in a major regional conflict: Courses of action and consequences. Final report
How should the Operational Commander address retaliation to chemical warfare in his deliberate planning process. Joint Doctrine and the Gulf War appear to indicate that nuclear weapons form the basis for an appropriate retaliation course of action. However, Nuclear Posture statements, policy discussions, and military engagement post facto revelations tend to minimize the employment probability of nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons do not present viable courses of action around which an executable plan can be built. However, conventional courses of action do, through analysis of chemical weapons, current policy and doctrine, nuclear employment probability, and regional perspectives, conventional courses of action surface as the politically and militarily supportable basis for planning. In addition to being a credible deterrent, employment in a retaliatory mode is not likely to ignite the global political maelstrom incidental to instigating the potential for nuclear war.
- Research Organization:
- Naval War Coll., Newport, RI (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 285139
- Report Number(s):
- AD-A-307401/0/XAB; TRN: 62250167
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: 12 Feb 1996
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Examination and assessment of the strategic posture of the United states. Master's thesis
Defending the Homeland: Growing Foreign Challenges to the U.S. Missile Defense Posture