Eliminating bias in CEM systems
Conference
·
OSTI ID:271834
- Source Technology Associates, Research Triangle Park, NC (United States)
The emission of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter from fossil-fuel fired power plants and industrial sources, is a matter of public concern that has led to both State and Federal requirements for pollution control. The accuracy of continuous emission monitoring (CEM) system data has been an issue of considerable importance in the development and implementation of the Acid Rain Program. The more stringent relative accuracy requirements of this program, coupled with the importance of emission trading allowances, has led to the need to minimize systematic errors in emissions measurement. With the inclusion of the t-test for bias in the Acid Rain Regulations of 40 CFR Part 75, a method was introduced that could be used to uncover systematic error, or bias, in CEM system measurements. Once bias is detected, it is highly desirable to either eliminate the cause of the bias or to apply correction factors to minimize its effect. However, a problem occurs in determining the cause of the bias; a task that is often both difficult and time consuming. This paper explains the rationale behind the bias test as applied to CEM systems and summarizes potential sources of systematic error in both extractive and in-situ CEM systems. The paper examines a number of factors that contribute to CEM system measurement error. Methods are suggested for both the detection and correction of the resulting biases.
- OSTI ID:
- 271834
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-950196--
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Operator`s guide to eliminating bias in CEM systems
EPA`s CEM Certification Review (C{_}REV) System
An examination of bias in Method 2 measurements under controlled non-axial flow conditions
Technical Report
·
Mon Oct 31 23:00:00 EST 1994
·
OSTI ID:642839
EPA`s CEM Certification Review (C{_}REV) System
Conference
·
Sat Dec 30 23:00:00 EST 1995
·
OSTI ID:271855
An examination of bias in Method 2 measurements under controlled non-axial flow conditions
Conference
·
Tue Dec 30 23:00:00 EST 1997
·
OSTI ID:617857