Non-proliferation issues for the disposition of fissile materials using reactor alternatives
- Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)
The Department of Energy (DOE) is analyzing long-term storage imposition options for excess weapons-usable fissile materials. A number of the disposition alternatives are being considered which involve the use of reactors. The various reactor alternatives are all very similar and include front-end processes that could convert plutonium to a usable form for fuel fabrication, a MOX fuel fab facility, reactors to burn the MOX fuel and ultimate disposal of spent fuel in some geologic repository. They include existing, partially completed, advanced or evolutionary light water reactors and Canadian deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors. In addition to the differences in the type of reactors, other variants on these alternatives are being evaluated to include the location and number of the reactors, the location of the mixed oxide (MOX) fabrication facility, the ownership of the facilities (private or government) and the colocation and/or separation of these facilities. All of these alternatives and their variants must be evaluated with respect to non-proliferation resistance. Both domestic and international safeguards support are being provided to DOE`s Fissile Materials Disposition Program (FMDP) and includes such areas as physical protection, nuclear materials accountability and material containment and surveillance. This paper will focus on how the non-proliferation objective of reducing security risks and strengthening arms reduction will be accomplished and what some of the non-proliferation issues are for the reactor alternatives. Proliferation risk has been defined in terms of material form, physical environment, and the level of security and safeguards that is applied to the material. Metrics have been developed for each of these factors. The reactor alternatives will be evaluated with respect to these proliferation risk factors at each of the unit process locations in the alternative.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Albuquerque, NM, and Livermore, CA (United States)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC04-94AL85000
- OSTI ID:
- 268097
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-960306-; ISBN 0-7918-1226-X; TRN: 96:016729
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: ICONE 4: ASME/JSME international conference on nuclear engineering, New Orleans, LA (United States), 10-13 Mar 1996; Other Information: PBD: 1996; Related Information: Is Part Of ICONE-4: Proceedings. Volume 4: Nuclear plant operations and maintenance, nuclear fuel cycle, institutional and energy policy, non-proliferation and safeguards; Rao, A.S. [ed.] [General Electric Nuclear Energy, San Jose, CA (United States)]; Duffey, R.B. [ed.] [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)]; Elias, D. [ed.] [Commonwealth Edison, Downers Grove, IL (United States)]; PB: 745 p.
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Implementation of safeguards and security for fissile materials disposition reactor alternative facilities
Non-proliferation, safeguards, and security for the fissile materials disposition program immobilization alternatives
Related Subjects
21 NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS
FISSILE MATERIALS
NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
SAFEGUARDS
WATER COOLED REACTORS
NUCLEAR FUELS
CANDU TYPE REACTORS
USA
NON-PROLIFERATION POLICY
US DOE
MIXED OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION PLANTS
MIXED OXIDE FUELS
RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
FUEL CYCLE