Uptake of polystyrene nanospheres by wheat and Arabidopsis roots in agar, hydroponics, and soil

Journal Article · Wed Jan 08 00:00:00 EST 2025 · Environmental Science: Nano

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EN01182A· OSTI ID:2572769

Adhikari, Kaushik ^[1]; Sanguinet, Karen A. ^[1]; Pearce, Carolyn I. ^[2]; Flury, Markus ^[1]

---

1. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA (United States)
2. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA (United States); Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)

Plant uptake of micro- and nanoplastics can lead to contamination of food with plastic particles and subsequent human consumption of plastics. There is evidence that plant roots can take up micro and nanoplastics; however, most of this evidence stems from experiments conducted with plants grown in hydroponics or agar systems where uptake of nanoparticles by roots is more favorable than when plants were grown in soil. Here, we discern the root uptake and accumulation of polystyrene nanospheres in plants grown in different growth media: agar, hydroponics, and soil. In addition, we tested the impacts of nanospheres on plant biomass and plant stress. Wheat and Arabidopsis thaliana were grown in agar, hydroponics, and soil media and exposed to polystyrene nanospheres. Three different nanospheres were used (40 nm and 200 nm carboxylate-modified and 200 nm amino-modified polystyrene) and uniformly mixed into the growth media. Plants were grown for 7 to 10 days and the roots were then examined for the presence of nanospheres by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Plant stress was evaluated by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS). We observed the 40 nm nanospheres inside the plant roots, but the 200 nm nanospheres only adhered to the root cap cells showing no uptake into the roots. Furthermore, confocal images indicated that root uptake of nanospheres was favored in hydroponic solutions as compared to agar and soil media. Plant biomass was generally not affected by the nanospheres, except for hydroponically grown Arabidopsis thaliana, where biomass was significantly reduced. Small sized (40 nm) and positively charged (200 nm amino-modified) nanospheres showed higher ROS accumulation in plants than negatively charged 200 nm carboxylate-modified nanospheres. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that polystyrene nanospheres can be taken up into the interior of plant roots and cause plant stress, but these impacts are less pronounced in media where the plastic particles are less mobile, like in agar and soil media as compared to hydroponic systems.

• Research Organization: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDA; USDOE
• Grant/Contract Number: AC05-76RL01830
• OSTI ID: 2572769
• Report Number(s): PNNL-SA--208435
• Journal Information: Environmental Science: Nano, Journal Name: Environmental Science: Nano Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 12; ISSN 2051-8153; ISSN 2051-8161
• Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES