Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gas emission associated with the lifecycle of buildings. Embodied carbon policies are critical for addressing the environmental impact of construction materials and advancing climate goals. Despite their importance, the adoption of embodied carbon policies has been limited globally, influenced by economic, environmental, institutional, and trade factors. This study employs structural equation modeling to analyze 37 countries, testing ten hypotheses across four categorical factors. The base model reveals the significant influence of environmental vulnerability and institutional frameworks on policy adoption, while robustness models confirm the critical role of trade dependencies and economic competitiveness in shaping national embodied carbon strategies. Findings underscore that countries with high climate vulnerability and strong institutional support are more likely to adopt embodied carbon policies. Conversely, trade-reliant nations face challenges balancing competitiveness and sustainability. Policy implications suggest the need for international collaboration to align trade policies with carbon reduction goals, targeted support for vulnerable nations, and the integration of embodied carbon considerations into existing climate frameworks. These results offer a roadmap for policymakers to design more effective and equitable embodied carbon policies, fostering global progress toward sustainable construction and decarbonization.
Hu, Ming, et al. "What drives embodied carbon policy? A global perspective on adoption." Environment, Development and Sustainability, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06090-x
Hu, Ming, Qiu, Yueming, & Nouri, Ali (2025). What drives embodied carbon policy? A global perspective on adoption. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06090-x
Hu, Ming, Qiu, Yueming, and Nouri, Ali, "What drives embodied carbon policy? A global perspective on adoption," Environment, Development and Sustainability (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06090-x
@article{osti_2529512,
author = {Hu, Ming and Qiu, Yueming and Nouri, Ali},
title = {What drives embodied carbon policy? A global perspective on adoption},
annote = {Abstract Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gas emission associated with the lifecycle of buildings. Embodied carbon policies are critical for addressing the environmental impact of construction materials and advancing climate goals. Despite their importance, the adoption of embodied carbon policies has been limited globally, influenced by economic, environmental, institutional, and trade factors. This study employs structural equation modeling to analyze 37 countries, testing ten hypotheses across four categorical factors. The base model reveals the significant influence of environmental vulnerability and institutional frameworks on policy adoption, while robustness models confirm the critical role of trade dependencies and economic competitiveness in shaping national embodied carbon strategies. Findings underscore that countries with high climate vulnerability and strong institutional support are more likely to adopt embodied carbon policies. Conversely, trade-reliant nations face challenges balancing competitiveness and sustainability. Policy implications suggest the need for international collaboration to align trade policies with carbon reduction goals, targeted support for vulnerable nations, and the integration of embodied carbon considerations into existing climate frameworks. These results offer a roadmap for policymakers to design more effective and equitable embodied carbon policies, fostering global progress toward sustainable construction and decarbonization.},
doi = {10.1007/s10668-025-06090-x},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2529512},
journal = {Environment, Development and Sustainability},
issn = {ISSN 1573-2975},
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media},
year = {2025},
month = {03}}
University, Yale Center For Environmental Law And Policy-YCELP-Yale; University, Center For International Earth Science Information Network-CIESIN-Columbia