Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A Review of the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Accident Dosimeter 1980s-present

Journal Article · · Radiation Measurements
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [2]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO (United States)
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

A Nuclear Accident Dosimetry program is a federal requirement for all facilities that have the potential to have a criticality accident. Personnel Nuclear Accident Dosimeter (PNAD) theory and analytical procedures are driven by various scientific needs and interacting regulations. A brief history of the status of USA Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear accident dosimetry regulations, recommendations, and performance testing criteria are given. Then, the history of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) PNAD is explored, including changes in the physical dosimeter and adjustments of the analysis method through the last four decades. Finally, the performance of LLNL’s PNAD at criticality accident intercomparison training exercises since 2009 is explored. In general, reported neutron doses have been within or close to DOE-STD-1098 performance criteria while reported gamma doses have been outside of DOE-STD-1098 performance criteria. Reported total absorbed doses have varied in meeting ANSI/HPS N13.3 and ANSI/HPS N13.3 (R2019) performance criteria. Dosimetry staff retirement and turnover have left historical knowledge gaps, yet provided opportunities within the NAD program at LLNL. This review paper serves as an overview of the history and status of the NAD program. Brief technical, procedural and programmatic recommendations to improve LLNL’s NAD program are given. Technical recommendations include investigating orientation factors through modeling or empirical experimentation, investigating gamma dosimetry methods for high-dose scenarios, and exploring other dosimetric methods for simpler, quicker NAD analysis. Procedural recommendations include better documentation of conversion factor (activity-to-fluence and fluence-to-dose) derivations and spectrum uses, and updated analysis spreadsheets or simple Graphic User Interfaces for dose calculations. In conclusion, programmatic recommendations include formalized training for NAD analysts, and having multiple SMEs trained on the NAD program.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344
OSTI ID:
2524111
Report Number(s):
LLNL--JRNL-860981; 1091371
Journal Information:
Radiation Measurements, Journal Name: Radiation Measurements Vol. 179; ISSN 1350-4487
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (1)

Nuclear Accident Dosimetry Intercomparison Studies journal September 1989