Information needs, approaches, and case studies in human health risk communication

Journal Article · Tue Sep 13 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · Risk Analysis

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14006· OSTI ID:2472399

Gochfeld, Michael ^[1]

---

1. Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP), Piscataway, NJ (United States); Rutgers Univ., Piscataway, NJ (United States). Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute; OSTI

This article uses ten case studies to illustrate the information needs, various communication approaches, and the communicator's role in explaining environmental health risks from a variety of hazards, to a variety of audiences, over time frames from days to years, using in person consultation, lectures, zooms, and email formats. Events often had a long history before the communication began and may have had a long tail afterward. Audiences may be public officials, companies, workers, communities, or individuals. Each individual may have their own understanding or mental model regarding the hazard, exposure, and risk. The communicator's role or intention may be to reassure an audience that has unrealistic exaggerated concerns or fears or to protect a client if the fears are realistic. Or it may be altruistic to inform a complacent audience to take the risks it faces more seriously. Although risk assessment research has advanced the techniques for communicating abstruse probabilities to audiences with low numeracy, in my experience, audiences are unimpressed by precise–sounding probability numbers, and are more interested in whether exposure is occurring or may occur and how to stop it. Often audiences have reason to be outraged and may be more concerned about punishing wrong doers than about the hazard itself, particularly when the exposure is past and cannot be undone. Thus, there is a difference between discussing the riskiness of a situation (risk communication) and what you are going to do about the situation (risk management). Risk communication is successful when the audience responds as intended, calming down or taking action. These case studies are drawn from a large number of risk communication experiences that I and my Rutgers colleagues have engaged in over the past four decades. Through the 20th century, New Jersey was the most densely industrialized State in United States. New Jersey experienced growth of the chemical and petrochemical industries and the unfortunately profligate disposal of toxic wastes. Having the most Superfund sites of any state is a dubious distinction, but New Jersey also has the most experience in evaluating and responding to these hazards.

• Research Organization: Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE
• Grant/Contract Number: FC01-06EW07053
• OSTI ID: 2472399
• Journal Information: Risk Analysis, Journal Name: Risk Analysis Journal Issue: 11 Vol. 42; ISSN 0272-4332
• Publisher: Wiley
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
Asbestos risks
Cancer risks
Credibility
Mathematical Methods In Social Sciences
Mathematics
Mental models
Public
Environmental & Occupational Health
Radiation risks
Risk perception