Application of multi-criteria decision analysis techniques and decision support framework for informing plant select agent designation and decision making
Journal Article
·
· Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), Silver Spring, MD (United States); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Washington, DC (United States)
- Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Retired, Livermore, CA (United States)
- Retired, Palmetto, FL (United States)
- Retired, Atlanta, GA (United States); IHRC, Atlanta, GA (United States)
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Division of Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins (DASAT) established a list of biological agents (Select Agents List) that threaten crops of economic importance to the United States and regulates the procedures governing containment, incident response, and the security of entities working with them. Every 2 years the USDA DASAT reviews their select agent list, utilizing assessments by subject matter experts (SMEs) to rank the agents. We explored the applicability of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques and a decision support framework (DSF) to support the USDA DASAT biennial review process. The evaluation includes both current and non-select agents to provide a robust assessment. We initially conducted a literature review of 16 pathogens against 9 criteria for assessing plant health and bioterrorism risk and documented the findings to support this analysis. Technical review of published data and associated scoring recommendations by pathogen-specific SMEs was found to be critical for ensuring accuracy. Scoring criteria were adopted to ensure consistency. The MCDA supported the expectation that select agents would rank high on the relative risk scale when considering the agricultural consequences of a bioterrorism attack; however, application of analytical thresholds as a basis for designating select agents led to some exceptions to current designations. A second analytical approach used agent-specific data to designate key criteria in a DSF logic tree format to identify pathogens of low concern that can be ruled out for further consideration as select agents. Both the MCDA and DSF approaches arrived at similar conclusions, suggesting the value of employing the two analytical approaches to add robustness for decision making.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- US Department of Homeland Security (DHS); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- NA0003525
- OSTI ID:
- 2469893
- Journal Information:
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Journal Name: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Vol. 11; ISSN 2296-4185
- Publisher:
- Frontiers Media S.A.Copyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Application of multi-criteria decision analysis techniques and decision support framework for informing select agent designation for agricultural animal pathogens
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques for Informing Select Agent Designation and Decision Making
The development and use of decision support framework for informing selection of select agent toxins with modelling studies to inform permissible toxin amounts
Journal Article
·
Sun Jun 04 20:00:00 EDT 2023
· Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
·
OSTI ID:2471770
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques for Informing Select Agent Designation and Decision Making
Journal Article
·
Thu Jun 02 20:00:00 EDT 2022
· Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
·
OSTI ID:2471769
The development and use of decision support framework for informing selection of select agent toxins with modelling studies to inform permissible toxin amounts
Journal Article
·
Sun Oct 02 20:00:00 EDT 2022
· Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
·
OSTI ID:2471771