The Realistic Potential of Soil Carbon Sequestration in U.S. Croplands for Climate Mitigation
- University of Montana, Missoula, MT (United States); Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C. (United States); University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group
- University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK (United States)
- Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR (United States)
- University of Wisconsin – Madison, WI (United States)
- Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC (United States)
Existing estimates of the climate mitigation potential from cropland carbon sequestration (C-sequestration) are limited because they tend to assume constant rates of soil organic carbon change over all available cropland area, use relatively coarse land delineations, and often fail to adequately consider the agronomic and socioeconomic dimensions of agricultural land use. This results in an inflated estimate of the C-sequestration potential. We address this gap by defining a more appropriate land base for cover cropping in the United States for C-sequestration purposes: stable croplands in annual production systems that can integrate cover cropping without irrigation. Our baseline estimate of this suitable stable cropland area is 32% of current U.S. cropland extent. Even an alternative, less restrictive definition of stability results in a large reduction in area (44% of current U.S. croplands). Focusing cover crop implementation to this constrained land base would increase durability of associated C-sequestration and limit soil carbon loss from land conversion to qualify for carbon-specific incentives. Applying spatially-variable C-sequestration rates from the literature to our baseline area yields a technical potential of 19.4 Tg CO2e yr–1 annually, about one-fifth of previous estimates. We also find the cost of realizing about half (10 Tg CO2e yr–1) of this potential could exceed 100 USD Mg CO2e–1, an order of magnitude higher than previously thought. While our economic analyses suggest that financial incentives are necessary for large-scale adoption of cover cropping in the U.S., they also imply any C-sequestration realized under such incentives is likely to be additional.
- Research Organization:
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC), Madison, WI (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0018409
- OSTI ID:
- 2406683
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 2472432
- Journal Information:
- Earth's Future, Journal Name: Earth's Future Journal Issue: 6 Vol. 12; ISSN 2328-4277
- Publisher:
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)Copyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Carbon sequestration potential in reclaimed mine sites in seven east-central states
Cropland carbon fluxes in the United States: increasing Geospatial Resolution of Inventory-Based Carbon Accounting
Journal Article
·
Sat Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2006
· Journal of Environmental Quality
·
OSTI ID:20781598
Cropland carbon fluxes in the United States: increasing Geospatial Resolution of Inventory-Based Carbon Accounting
Journal Article
·
Thu Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 2009
· Ecological Applications
·
OSTI ID:981416