Circular Economy Contributions to Decarbonizing the US Steel Sector
The potential benefits of the circular economy (CE) for decarbonization have recently attracted much attention in the academic and grey literature. The department of energy (DOE) industrial decarbonization roadmap highlight that in addition to the four pillars (energy efficiency, electrification, low-carbon fuels, feedstocks, and energy sources, and carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS)) identified in the roadmap, "scenarios [...] will need to be developed that incorporate materials efficiency and circular economy strategies". Moreover, the roadmap identifies hard-to-abate CO2 emissions across the five industrial subsectors included in the analysis (iron & steel, chemical, food & beverage, refining, and cement manufacturing). Thus, additional options to decarbonize the industrial sector, like the CE, could prove beneficial to address those hard-to-abate emissions. Moreover, they may be less costly, require less R&D or incentives, and be more readily adopted than other strategies such as energy efficiency and CCUS. While the Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap includes some CE strategies (e.g., the increasing market share of steel from electric arc furnaces - which incorporate steel scrap), a deeper dive into what role the CE could play in the United States (US) industrial decarbonization is needed. In this work, we present several industrial decarbonization scenarios that incorporate materials efficiency and circular economy strategies for the iron & steel subsector. The scenarios identify barriers (including technical limits and constraints), opportunities, and R&D needs.Moreover, we estimate the contribution of those scenarios to reducing the industrial sector's CO2 emissions and their potential synergies with the Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap's four pillars. Iron & steel manufacturing was responsible for 90 million tons of industrial CO2 emissions in 2020 - 7% of the industrial sector's total process- related emissions. Besides recycling - which presents technical limitations due to trace contaminants - CE strategies on the demand side could lower iron & steel manufacturing emissions (e.g., the development of lighter products or business models that encourage a more intensive use). This study reviews barriers, opportunities, and trade-offs for 5 material efficiency strategies. Many topics explored in the review call for further research.
- Research Organization:
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Technologies Office (AMMTO)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC36-08GO28308
- OSTI ID:
- 2372885
- Report Number(s):
- NREL/CH-6A20-90213; MainId:91991; UUID:8d4142ed-e5e6-4802-a845-62e60a13c160; MainAdminId:72808
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Uncovering the driving forces of carbon dioxide emissions in Chinese manufacturing industry: An intersectoral analysis
Pathways Analysis Summary: Decarbonization Potential for Industrial Subsectors - Preliminary Modeling Results
Midwest Nuclear-based Net-Zero Carbon Steelmaking Demonstration
Journal Article
·
Tue Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2019
· Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
·
OSTI ID:1818494
Pathways Analysis Summary: Decarbonization Potential for Industrial Subsectors - Preliminary Modeling Results
Technical Report
·
Thu Jun 20 00:00:00 EDT 2024
·
OSTI ID:2447292
Midwest Nuclear-based Net-Zero Carbon Steelmaking Demonstration
Technical Report
·
Wed Jun 30 20:00:00 EDT 2021
·
OSTI ID:1855592