Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Circular Economy Contributions to Decarbonizing the US Steel Sector

Book ·
The potential benefits of the circular economy (CE) for decarbonization have recently attracted much attention in the academic and grey literature. The department of energy (DOE) industrial decarbonization roadmap highlight that in addition to the four pillars (energy efficiency, electrification, low-carbon fuels, feedstocks, and energy sources, and carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS)) identified in the roadmap, "scenarios [...] will need to be developed that incorporate materials efficiency and circular economy strategies". Moreover, the roadmap identifies hard-to-abate CO2 emissions across the five industrial subsectors included in the analysis (iron & steel, chemical, food & beverage, refining, and cement manufacturing). Thus, additional options to decarbonize the industrial sector, like the CE, could prove beneficial to address those hard-to-abate emissions. Moreover, they may be less costly, require less R&D or incentives, and be more readily adopted than other strategies such as energy efficiency and CCUS. While the Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap includes some CE strategies (e.g., the increasing market share of steel from electric arc furnaces - which incorporate steel scrap), a deeper dive into what role the CE could play in the United States (US) industrial decarbonization is needed. In this work, we present several industrial decarbonization scenarios that incorporate materials efficiency and circular economy strategies for the iron & steel subsector. The scenarios identify barriers (including technical limits and constraints), opportunities, and R&D needs.Moreover, we estimate the contribution of those scenarios to reducing the industrial sector's CO2 emissions and their potential synergies with the Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap's four pillars. Iron & steel manufacturing was responsible for 90 million tons of industrial CO2 emissions in 2020 - 7% of the industrial sector's total process- related emissions. Besides recycling - which presents technical limitations due to trace contaminants - CE strategies on the demand side could lower iron & steel manufacturing emissions (e.g., the development of lighter products or business models that encourage a more intensive use). This study reviews barriers, opportunities, and trade-offs for 5 material efficiency strategies. Many topics explored in the review call for further research.
Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Technologies Office (AMMTO)
DOE Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
2372885
Report Number(s):
NREL/CH-6A20-90213; MainId:91991; UUID:8d4142ed-e5e6-4802-a845-62e60a13c160; MainAdminId:72808
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (17)

Reducing CO2 Emissions from U.S. Steel Consumption by 70% by 2050 journal October 2020
Short-Lived Buildings in China: Impacts on Water, Energy, and Carbon Emissions journal November 2015
US industrial sector decoupling of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions under COVID: durability and decarbonization journal March 2021
A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm journal October 2020
The role of blockchain technology in the transition toward the circular economy: Findings from a systematic literature review journal May 2023
Bottom-up estimates of deep decarbonization of U.S. manufacturing in 2050 journal January 2022
Wind turbine blade recycling: Experiences, challenges and possibilities in a circular economy journal December 2018
Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review journal April 2019
Mapping the Annual Flow of Steel in the United States journal August 2019
Saving resources and the climate? A systematic review of the circular economy and its mitigation potential journal November 2020
Life cycle assessment of steel in the ship recycling industry in Bangladesh journal November 2016
Assessing the potential of yield improvements, through process scrap reduction, for energy and CO2 abatement in the steel and aluminium sectors journal October 2011
Reusing Steel and Aluminum Components at End of Product Life journal August 2012
An investigation of hard-disk drive circularity accounting for socio-technical dynamics and data uncertainty journal March 2022
Comparing energy and material efficiency rebound effects: an exploration of scenarios in the GEM-E3 macroeconomic model journal July 2020
The potential for material circularity and independence in the U.S. steel sector journal January 2020
Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production
  • Allwood, Julian M.; Ashby, Michael F.; Gutowski, Timothy G.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 371, Issue 1986 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0496
journal March 2013