Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Scenario development for safety assessment in deep geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel: A review

Journal Article · · Risk Analysis
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14276· OSTI ID:2311288
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5]
  1. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
  2. Centrale Organisatie Voor Radioactief Afval (COVRA), Nieuwdorp (Netherlands)
  3. Nuclear Waste Services, Harwell (United Kingdom)
  4. BGE Technology GmbH (BGE-TEC), Piene (Germany)
  5. Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit gGmbH (GRS), Braunschweig (Germany)

Radiation and radioactive substances result in the production of radioactive wastes which require safe management and disposal to avoid risks to human health and the environment. To ensure permanent safe disposal, the performance of a deep geological repository for radioactive waste is assessed against internationally agreed risk-based standards. Assessing postclosure safety of the future system's evolution includes screening of features, events, and processes (FEPs) relevant to the situation, their subsequent development into scenarios, and finally the development and execution of safety assessment (SA) models. Global FEP catalogs describe important natural and man-made repository system features and identify events and processes that may affect these features into the future. By combining FEPs, many of which are uncertain, different possible future system evolution scenarios are derived. Repository licensing should consider both the reference or “base” evolution as well as alternative futures that may lead to radiation release, pollution, or exposures. Scenarios are used to derive and consider both base and alternative evolutions, often through production of scenario-specific SA models and the recombination of their results into an assessment of the risk of harm. Furthermore, while the FEP-based scenario development process outlined here has evolved somewhat since its development in the 1980s, the fundamental ideas remain unchanged. A spectrum of common approaches is given here (e.g., bottom–up vs. top–down scenario development, probabilistic vs. bounding handling of uncertainty), related to how individual numerical models for possible futures are converted into a determination as to whether the system is safe (i.e., how aleatoric uncertainty and scenarios are integrated through bounding or Monte Carlo approaches).

Research Organization:
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition. Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology
Grant/Contract Number:
NA0003525
OSTI ID:
2311288
Report Number(s):
SAND--2024-01098J
Journal Information:
Risk Analysis, Journal Name: Risk Analysis Journal Issue: 8 Vol. 44; ISSN 0272-4332
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (30)

Multiple scenario development: Its conceptual and behavioral foundation journal March 1993
Historical background on performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant journal September 2000
Scenario development for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance Certification Application journal September 2000
Characterization of stochastic uncertainty in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant journal September 2000
Characterization of subjective uncertainty in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant journal September 2000
Systematic FEP and scenario analysis to provide a framework for assessing long-term performance of the Krechba CO2 storage system at In Salah journal January 2011
Features Events and Processes (FEPs) and Scenario Analysis in the Field of CO2 Storage journal January 2013
The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning journal October 2005
Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: Enhancing the scenario method journal October 2009
Conceptual basis for the definition and calculation of expected dose in performance assessments for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada journal March 2009
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for the nominal scenario class in the 2008 performance assessment for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada journal February 2014
Expected dose and associated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results for all scenario classes in the 2008 performance assessment for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada journal February 2014
Permeability of crystalline rocks journal January 1992
Managing uncertainty: a review of food system scenario analysis and modelling journal September 2010
Local Acceptance of a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository journal June 2004
On The Quantitative Definition of Risk journal March 1981
A Multiattribute Utility Analysis of Alternative Sites for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste journal June 1987
An Analysis of the Portfolio of Sites to Characterize for Selecting a Nuclear Repository journal June 1987
Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model journal September 1992
Public Opposition to a Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository in Canada: An Investigation of Cultural and Economic Effects journal June 1997
Historical Relationship Between Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment journal October 1999
Analysis of Local Acceptance of a Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility journal July 2008
Flood Risk Assessment in the Netherlands: A Case Study for Dike Ring South Holland journal October 2008
Nuclear Risk Management on Stage: A Decision Analysis Perspective on the UK's Committee on Radioactive Waste Management journal April 2009
Scenario Analysis for the Safety Assessment of Nuclear Waste Repositories: A Critical Review journal September 2017
The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions journal August 2009
Risk, Uncertainty in Risk, and the EPA Release Limits for Radioactive Waste Disposal journal January 1993
Ologs: A Categorical Framework for Knowledge Representation journal January 2012
Understanding Uncertainty in Geothermal Energy Development Using a Formalized Performance Assessment Approach.
  • Lowry, Thomas
  • Proposed for presentation at the 2021 Geothermal Rising Conference held October 3-6, 2021 in San Diego, CA US https://doi.org/10.2172/1891084
conference October 2021
Conceptual model development using a generic Features, Events, and Processes (FEP) database for assessing the potential impact of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater aquifers journal August 2018