Comparing dietary and non-dietary source contribution of BPA and DEHP to prenatal exposure: A Catalonia (Spain) case study
- Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Departament d'Enginyeria Quimica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia (Spain)
- Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Sant Llorenç 21, 43201 Reus, Catalonia (Spain)
Highlights: • Comparing dietary and non-dietary prenatal exposure to BPA and DEHP. • PBPK model predict the fetus’ toxicokinetic profile based on mother exposure. • Non-diet sources exposure contribution is smaller than diet sources. • First-pass metabolism is lacking in dermal and inhalation exposure. • More unconjugated BPA is expected due to a lack of the first-pass metabolism. Bisphenol A (BPA) and Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are two wide spread chemicals classified as endocrine disruptors (ED). The present study aims to estimate the non-dietary (dermal, non-dietary ingestion and inhalation) exposure to BPA and DEHP for a pregnant women cohort. In addition, to assess the prenatal exposure for the fetus, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used. It was adapted for pregnancy in order to assess the internal dosimetry levels of EDs (BPA and DEHP) in the fetus. Estimates of exposure to BPA and DEHP from all pathways along with their relative importance were provided in order to establish which proportion of the total exposure came from diet and which came from non-dietary exposures. In this study, the different oral dosing scenarios (dietary and non-dietary) were considered keeping inhalation as a continuous exposure case. Total non-dietary mean values were 0.002 µg/kg{sub bw}/day (0.000; 0.004 µg/kg{sub bw}/day for 5th and 95th percentile, respectively) for BPA and 0.597 µg/kg{sub bw}/day (0.116 µg/kg{sub bw}/day and 1.506 µg/kg{sub bw}/day for 5th and 95th percentile, respectively) for DEHP. Indoor environments and especially dust ingestion were the main non-dietary contributors to the total exposure of BPA and DEHP with 60% and 81%. However, as expected, diet showed the higher contribution to total exposure with > 99.9% for BPA and 63% for DEHP. Although diet was considered the primary source of exposure to BPA and phthalates, it must be taken into account that with non-dietary sources the first-pass metabolism is lacking, so these may be of equal or even higher toxicological relevance than dietary sources. The present study is in the framework of “Health and environmental-wide associations based on large population surveys” (HEALS) project (FP7–603946).
- OSTI ID:
- 23105875
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Research, Vol. 166; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0013-9351
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Nonylphenol in pregnant women and their matching fetuses: Placental transfer and potential risks of infants
Urinary phthalate metabolites and environmental phenols in university students in South China