Numerical Uncertainties vs. Model Uncertainties in Two-phase Flow Simulations

Journal Article · Sat Jul 01 04:00:00 EDT 2017 · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society

OSTI ID:23050368

Zou, Ling; Zhao, Haihua; Zhang, Hongbin ^[1]

---

1. Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 N Freemont Ave., Idaho Falls, ID 83415 (United States)

In recent years, verification, validation and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) have become a common practice in thermal-hydraulics analysis. In general, these activities deal with propagations of uncertainties in computer code simulations, e.g., through system analysis codes. However, most existing such activities in thermal-hydraulics analysis have been primarily focused on model uncertainties, while numerical uncertainties were largely overlooked. Numerical uncertainties (or numerical errors) can appear in many different forms, e.g., round-off error, statistical sampling error, and discretization error. As pointed out by Oberkampf and Roy, discretization error is usually the largest however the most difficult type of error to estimate reliably. In thermal-hydraulics analysis, especially two-phase flow simulations commonly encountered in reactor safety analysis, the lack of consideration on discretization error is mainly due to the difficulty in estimating them. Accurate estimations on discretization error require continuous mesh refinement and/or implementation of high-order numerical schemes in system analysis code, both of which are unfortunately difficult to achieve for existing codes. At first, it should be emphasized that mesh refinement (or mesh sensitivity study) is a well-understood concept in the thermal-hydraulics field. However, it is not commonly practiced for many reasons, e.g., lack of understanding on numerical errors by code users, consideration on computational cost, deteriorated numerical stability performance with refined meshes, and etc. Secondly, high-order (e.g., second-order) numerical schemes are simply unavailable in almost any existing system analysis code. Implementation of high-order numerical schemes in these codes is difficult, if not impossible, given the complexity of these codes. On the other hand, people tend to argue that numerical uncertainties (or discretization error as we have emphasized) are not as important as the commonly large uncertainties in two-phase flow models, e.g., closure correlations. As a result, nodalization is sometimes played unintentionally, or maybe intentionally, to match experimental data, which is referred as 'user effects' or 'compensating errors' in thermal-hydraulics community. Such a practice is highly criticized by Levy. In this work, we will at first build a computer code that incorporates both first-order and second-order numerical methods to solve the two-phase flow problems. The first-order method resembles the one used in many existing system analysis codes; and the second-order method works as the reference to estimate numerical errors. Numerical verifications on spatial discretization schemes will be presented in the form of mesh convergence study. It will also be demonstrated that, in practical scenarios, discretization errors can be as large as, or even larger than, model uncertainties via case studies.

• OSTI ID: 23050368
• Journal Information: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Journal Name: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society Vol. 116; ISSN 0003-018X
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

42 ENGINEERING
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING
COMPUTER CODES
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
CONVERGENCE
ERRORS
FLOW MODELS
PERFORMANCE
REACTOR SAFETY
SAFETY ANALYSIS
SAMPLING
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
THERMAL HYDRAULICS
TWO-PHASE FLOW
VALIDATION
VERIFICATION