Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Towards a Neutronic and Thermal-Hydraulic Safety Analysis of PWR Fuel Bow with SIMULATE5 and COBRA-TF

Journal Article · · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
OSTI ID:23042913
; ;  [1];  [2]
  1. E.ON Kernkraft GmbH, Tresckowstrasse 5, D-30457, Hannover (Georgia)
  2. Studsvik, 340 Tschiffely Square Rd, Gaithersburg, MD, US (Georgia)

In the 1990's, collective fuel assembly bow was observed in the Ringhals PWRs in Sweden. Back then fuel vendors reinforced the fuel assemblies' dashpot, decreased hold-down spring forces, increased guide tube wall thickness, and introduced guide tube materials with higher creep resistance in order to improve dimensional stability. Nevertheless, twenty years later in 2010, the same kind of collective bow with S and C shape patterns started to appear in most of Germany's PWRs. At this time the SIMULATE5 (S5) core simulator with its delta-gap bow model (DGA) which was originally developed for safety analysis at Ringhals, could be used as an off-the-shelf solution to assess the impact of bow on Fq and FH. However, these two quantities are of secondary importance in German PWRs in normal operation because the most restricting licensing criteria set limits on DNBRmin values. For this purpose, a method was developed to extract S5 pin powers from DGA calculations and automatically generate COBRA-TF input files (CTF) to analyze DNBR values in the cores. In the following two sections, it is shown how the S5 model for DGA calculations has been verified with independent MCNP6 calculations in order to check its predictions on pin power changes for delta gaps up to 1 cm in size and how the existing licensed DNBR calculation methodology has been updated to bowed fuel assembly situations with the help of CTF. Finally, the applicability of the Doroschuk CHF correlation, which is the licensing standard in most German PWRs, is discussed. For the fuel bow patterns considered, it is assumed that only the gap between fuel assemblies change and that the pitch between fuel rods inside the assemblies remains largely unchanged. This approximation can be justified by the visual inspections conducted at the plants during the outages. Every calculation of the pin-power impact of delta-gaps in the core under operating conditions is only as good as the knowledge of the bow pattern. Measurements of fuel assembly bow at cold conditions have been made for some German PWRs for all the fuel assemblies in the core during plant outages. Together with methods developed by the fuel assembly vendors, a best-estimate bow pattern during operation could be reconstructed. (authors)

OSTI ID:
23042913
Journal Information:
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Journal Name: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society Vol. 115; ISSN 0003-018X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English